<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box Office Report: &#8216;Night at the Museum&#8217; opens with $70 mil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/</link>
	<description>Showbiz News and Scoops &#124; Studio and Network Dish</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perry Lane</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9942</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9942</guid>
		<description>What great summer for fantasy and sci-fi. We&#039;ve had Wolverine,and the wonderful new Star Trek. Even online, the guys at pyramidsofmars.com have finally published the last chapter of their online novel. So, now with Terminator and Night at the Museum out, I&#039;m waiting on Transformers!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What great summer for fantasy and sci-fi. We&#8217;ve had Wolverine,and the wonderful new Star Trek. Even online, the guys at pyramidsofmars.com have finally published the last chapter of their online novel. So, now with Terminator and Night at the Museum out, I&#8217;m waiting on Transformers!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t3hdow</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9913</link>
		<dc:creator>t3hdow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9913</guid>
		<description>To Fred2:
I get the nepotism/remake points, but part of the Six Degrees role was written for the actor to kiss another male. Not that I&#039;m disappointed he refused, but if he&#039;s willing to let that scare him off, I&#039;m a little worried at how dedication towards his future roles. Worse yet, if that makes him iffy, imagine how much he &amp; Spielberg might butcher the Oldboy remake, because he might not be cool with the original film&#039;s risque content. Granted, none of this will keep me from Will Smith&#039;s films if I&#039;m interested, but this bothers me, nonetheless.
To Rob Grizzly:
WTF? How is Salvation&#039;s box office an epic fail when
a) It made more than T3&#039;s 44 mil opening weekend (approx. 50% more)
b) It&#039;s generally more well liked than T3 and
c) It&#039;s opening versus a sequel of a popular family film, which almost always beats the other movies opening the same weekend? If a 3 million margin is what you consider a massive failure, I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not your future kid.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Fred2:<br />
I get the nepotism/remake points, but part of the Six Degrees role was written for the actor to kiss another male. Not that I&#8217;m disappointed he refused, but if he&#8217;s willing to let that scare him off, I&#8217;m a little worried at how dedication towards his future roles. Worse yet, if that makes him iffy, imagine how much he &amp; Spielberg might butcher the Oldboy remake, because he might not be cool with the original film&#8217;s risque content. Granted, none of this will keep me from Will Smith&#8217;s films if I&#8217;m interested, but this bothers me, nonetheless.<br />
To Rob Grizzly:<br />
WTF? How is Salvation&#8217;s box office an epic fail when<br />
a) It made more than T3&#8217;s 44 mil opening weekend (approx. 50% more)<br />
b) It&#8217;s generally more well liked than T3 and<br />
c) It&#8217;s opening versus a sequel of a popular family film, which almost always beats the other movies opening the same weekend? If a 3 million margin is what you consider a massive failure, I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not your future kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9902</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9902</guid>
		<description>saw T4, thought it was great.  was mostly a great action film, but it did have heart.  sam worthington did a great job, bale was solid in a less emotional role.  overall, connor grew into the leader we expected.  of course movie would be different now that it was in the future.  more of a war movie, but it progressed the story just fine, still kept some of the feel of the first two.  i also viewed it as more of an action set up to a sequel that would give more background on connor/kyle reese relationship.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw T4, thought it was great.  was mostly a great action film, but it did have heart.  sam worthington did a great job, bale was solid in a less emotional role.  overall, connor grew into the leader we expected.  of course movie would be different now that it was in the future.  more of a war movie, but it progressed the story just fine, still kept some of the feel of the first two.  i also viewed it as more of an action set up to a sequel that would give more background on connor/kyle reese relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>Took in to see the T4 with no high expectations.  Was a great action film in every sense of the word.  Non stop action for those who enjoy a rocking good time.  More character driven story would have been even more great.  But all in all, it was a great ride.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took in to see the T4 with no high expectations.  Was a great action film in every sense of the word.  Non stop action for those who enjoy a rocking good time.  More character driven story would have been even more great.  But all in all, it was a great ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>I saw T-4, was disapointed. The John Connors&#039; character could have been played by any actor. The whole feel of the movie felt out of place. I did not like any of the characters, especially John Connors&#039;. However, I did enjoy the role of the deaf girl, she had more heart and guts than all the other characters.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw T-4, was disapointed. The John Connors&#8217; character could have been played by any actor. The whole feel of the movie felt out of place. I did not like any of the characters, especially John Connors&#8217;. However, I did enjoy the role of the deaf girl, she had more heart and guts than all the other characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9863</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9863</guid>
		<description>See the movie online here!!
&lt;a href=&quot;http://45470adf.seriousfiles.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://45470adf.seriousfiles.com&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the movie online here!!<br />
<a href="http://45470adf.seriousfiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://45470adf.seriousfiles.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judas</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9851</link>
		<dc:creator>Judas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9851</guid>
		<description>Though Museum 2 is alot like the first one, I enjoyed every second of it, especially watching the cupids! Love them! They&#039;re the Jonas, aren&#039;t they? Sounds soulful...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Museum 2 is alot like the first one, I enjoyed every second of it, especially watching the cupids! Love them! They&#8217;re the Jonas, aren&#8217;t they? Sounds soulful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura G.</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9840</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9840</guid>
		<description>Great to see Star Trek holding up so well.  My husband and I finally saw it this weekend - great reboot!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see Star Trek holding up so well.  My husband and I finally saw it this weekend &#8211; great reboot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9829</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9829</guid>
		<description>Yay Star Trek!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Star Trek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kraft</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1/comment-page-2/#comment-9816</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/05/25/box-office-re-1#comment-9816</guid>
		<description>How wonderful it is to see a class act like &quot;Star Trek&quot; rake in the megabucks at the box office. For once, a truly fine film gets critical and popular acclaim. Long live &quot;Star Trek!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How wonderful it is to see a class act like &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; rake in the megabucks at the box office. For once, a truly fine film gets critical and popular acclaim. Long live &#8220;Star Trek!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
