Comments on: SAG plans return to the negotiating table

By: scoogy47

scoogy47 — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:13:38 +0000

I really am disappointed in SAG during this recession time! I really hope they take a look and think about what they are asking for. People are losing their jobs left and right in this economy! They will be responsible for putting more people out of work if they keep this up!

By: peggy

peggy — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:03:09 +0000

Are they serious about asking the studios for money especially the way the state of the economy is. People r losing homes,jobs and some cases their families and these actors want more money. What the#?>.&. It must suck to make 5 million a year. I guess u want more. What a joke.

By: charlie

charlie — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:19:48 +0000

Have our vain/self-glamorizing actors thought about the destruction they are causing to below-the-line employees. I will NEVER support an actors’ contract talk again. In these trying times their damn egos mean more to them than any talk of brotherhood. I truly hope they get NOTHING

By: David Foster

David Foster — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:46:41 +0000

And the sooner that SAG gets rid of Rosenberg the better. He is also one of the major problems with our union leadership. If it were up to him, we would go out on strike and achieve nothing. I feel the new negotiating team will get the job done in spite of Allen and Rosenberg`s ineptness.

By: ShutUpRob

ShutUpRob — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:00:07 +0000

I would hardly call the UFS faction of SAG “moderate.” Passive-aggressive (versus MF’s aggressive/bellicose) yes, moderate, no.