<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratings: Barbara Walters&#8217; &#8216;Patrick Swayze: The Truth&#8217; sets ABC free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze/</link>
	<description>Showbiz News and Scoops &#124; Studio and Network Dish</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt2</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>I also found it odd that they would air repeats the very next day, but apparently it paid off. Combining the two nights, that equates to 11 million viewers per episode for the first two new shows in the series. An even bigger plus has to be that the repeat episodes scored higher ratings than some of the new episodes of According To Jim, the lame sitcom that never should have received renewal in the first place.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found it odd that they would air repeats the very next day, but apparently it paid off. Combining the two nights, that equates to 11 million viewers per episode for the first two new shows in the series. An even bigger plus has to be that the repeat episodes scored higher ratings than some of the new episodes of According To Jim, the lame sitcom that never should have received renewal in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter B</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2009/01/08/walters-swayze#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>If we add the ratings for Scrubs from Tuesday and Wednesday, does this mean it got decent ratings? While I do find it odd that ABC repeated the show so quickly, I hope the multiple showings helps it in the long run. It is a deserving show (as opposed to say...Knight Rider).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we add the ratings for Scrubs from Tuesday and Wednesday, does this mean it got decent ratings? While I do find it odd that ABC repeated the show so quickly, I hope the multiple showings helps it in the long run. It is a deserving show (as opposed to say&#8230;Knight Rider).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
