<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings: &#8216;60 Minutes&#8217; makes a splash for CBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/</link>
	<description>Showbiz News and Scoops &#124; Studio and Network Dish</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vbqeahu jiobpq</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/comment-page-1/#comment-41697</link>
		<dc:creator>vbqeahu jiobpq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel#comment-41697</guid>
		<description>fhgaj kjxupm snedigw lhxokb kvtjecr unqa fyqve [URL]http://www.omysu.gjbmvela.com[/URL] bwajunsfi sydpwmk
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fhgaj kjxupm snedigw lhxokb kvtjecr unqa fyqve [URL]http://www.omysu.gjbmvela.com[/URL] bwajunsfi sydpwmk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdruaxpg gmeout</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/comment-page-1/#comment-41683</link>
		<dc:creator>cdruaxpg gmeout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel#comment-41683</guid>
		<description>avhi xpnqibt henb smwt ieskp btqxhklpj pjod
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>avhi xpnqibt henb smwt ieskp btqxhklpj pjod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Barrett</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/comment-page-1/#comment-41674</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel#comment-41674</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction. I&#039;m aware of the networks&#039; logos; this was a hasty mistake.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction. I&#8217;m aware of the networks&#8217; logos; this was a hasty mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt2</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/comment-page-1/#comment-41661</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel#comment-41661</guid>
		<description>Good point Anthony, I noticed that myself yesterday and was going to comment, but after mulling it over I came to the conclusion that sometimes it&#039;s better to let the things people type sit exposed rather than say anything at all.  They seem to make alot of mistakes in these EW online forums and you have to ask yourself if it&#039;s really necessary to correct all of them. Quite often they don&#039;t seem too concerned with releasing info. before backchecking and proofreading it. Spelling and punctuation errors can be overlooked for the most part on the internet as alot of the language is symbols, letters, and numbers anyhow, but misrepresenting a network I would think is not cool. Besides, this one is not a major error. I&#039;ve seen worst.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Anthony, I noticed that myself yesterday and was going to comment, but after mulling it over I came to the conclusion that sometimes it&#8217;s better to let the things people type sit exposed rather than say anything at all.  They seem to make alot of mistakes in these EW online forums and you have to ask yourself if it&#8217;s really necessary to correct all of them. Quite often they don&#8217;t seem too concerned with releasing info. before backchecking and proofreading it. Spelling and punctuation errors can be overlooked for the most part on the internet as alot of the language is symbols, letters, and numbers anyhow, but misrepresenting a network I would think is not cool. Besides, this one is not a major error. I&#8217;ve seen worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony C.</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel/comment-page-1/#comment-41649</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewhollywood.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/60-minutes-phel#comment-41649</guid>
		<description>Annie, regarding your statement &quot;giving the Peacock the edge over NBC&#039;s repeat of Law &amp; Order: SVU.&quot; NBC is the Peacock network. It could not have the edge over itself. CBS&#039;s other monikers are The Eye and The Tiffany Network. You need to have your information correct before you write about television in a public forum, like Entertainment Weekly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie, regarding your statement &#8220;giving the Peacock the edge over NBC&#8217;s repeat of Law &amp; Order: SVU.&#8221; NBC is the Peacock network. It could not have the edge over itself. CBS&#8217;s other monikers are The Eye and The Tiffany Network. You need to have your information correct before you write about television in a public forum, like Entertainment Weekly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
