Submit a tip to Insider
  • More
Back to Hollywood Insider Home
EW Home

'Idol' contestant David Cook under fire again, this time for his 'Eleanor Rigby' performance

Mar 30, 2008, 08:42 PM | by Shirley Halperin

Categories: American Idol, Music, Music Biz, Television

Davidcook_l Though Chris Cornell was acknowledged to be the source of David Cook's "Billie Jean" rearrangement on last week's American Idol, another band has come out demanding Cook (pictured) credit their cover of "Eleanor Rigby." Doxology, a rock-soul group out of Seattle (who happen to be pals with last season's runner-up Blake Lewis), claim that on March 11 Cook performed their version of the Beatles' classic — which has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007 — without crediting them.

In a statement issued to the press on Saturday, lead vocalist Luke McPherson contends, "When given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not." The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties  (which they could have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air). Their impetus: "We just want David Cook and American Idol to do the right thing and acknowledge these facts. It's that simple." Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend.

Read the band's full press release after the jump.

Seattle, WA – March 28, 2008:  After much deliberation, Doxology is releasing a statement to the press.  There are many reasons that the Seattle area band feels it is necessary to shed some light on recent events.  First and foremost, Doxology is not angry with David Cook or American Idol. They are, however, troubled by the lack of public acknowledgement that the arrangement of "Eleanor Rigby," used by David Cook on American Idol's March 11, 2008 episode and its’ subsequent iTunes studio recording, is a near note-for-note copy of a unique demo arrangement recorded by Doxology in 2006.  The band feels that David is a great performer, and they are also supporters and fans of American Idol (Blake Lewis, a good friend of the band, was last season's American Idol runner up). Secondly, Doxology is in disagreement with Idol's decision to post David Cook's performance and studio recording on iTunes.  This allows American Idol to profit from the David Cook, March 11th performance and studio recording, without crediting the source for the recording's arrangement. This is not the first time American Idol has had to deal with this type of issue. During season 5 of Idol, Chris Daughtry used an arrangement from a band without crediting his source.   To listen to Doxology’s original demo recording of “Eleanor Rigby” and additional original song selections visit www.myspace.com/dxband.

Doxology lead vocalist Luke McPherson: "Our main issue is that when given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not."  Luke goes on to say, "We were even more surprised when the studio recording, released Thursday morning, was even more of a note-for-note instrumental copy of Doxology's recording.  I want to be clear. We are not seeking royalties. That's not what this is about.  The compensation we are asking for is the easiest and least expensive around – we, at minimum, want David Cook and/or American Idol to admit that the arrangement he performed on March 11th, and then went into the studio and recorded for immediate sale, was not only inspired by, but almost completely carbon copied from our arrangement. We just want David Cook and American Idol to do the right thing and acknowledge these facts. It's that simple."

1 2 3 Next »

Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:53 PM EST

light on is a copy of band of horses- the funeral, get the word out!

Angelo F.

Nancy Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:02 PM EST

Hate the remake of Peter Gabriel's In Your Eyes that is playing on the radio. Yet another copycat song from an American Idol contestant.

sdunlap Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:52 PM EST

I don't get it...they're issuing a statement regarding not getting their credit, but the video ON their myspace page shows David Cook saying exactly where he found the version he did! wtf???

Idol Fan Fri, May 23, 2008 at 03:42 AM EST

Forget that U2 malarkey from last night...his best performance can be seen here:

http://www.haikureviewer.com/2008/04/30/all-i-really-need-is-you-david-cook-american-idol-2008/

brooke Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM EST

david all the way im 43 and i love his singing he is great david a if he wins it doesnt matter david cook will get the most records sold im voting for him

brooke Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM EST

david all the way im 43 and i love his singing he is great david a if he wins it doesnt matter david cook will get the most records sold im voting for him

Ser0mancerXXIV Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:11 AM EST

I think that the band DOXOLOGY just wants a way to get there band in the media. They truly defile the Beatles song. Go listen to there music on myspace and you can just hear there lack of vocal talent. Some of there stuff is ok but I think all this is a pathetic joke. David Cook has great range and the music industry needs someone like him!

Lolo Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:01 PM EST

David i love you just keep rockin'! You are totally the best one there and you should win it all!!!:)
(i also think your totllay the hottest one there mw and my bff are obsessed with you!!!!)

Laura Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:54 PM EST

Omg!!!! I luv david cook!!! he is totally the best there and if he dose't wil it will definatly be the wrong choice!!!! Vote David! D.C> for me! Hooked on Cook!! this is a totally awsome performance (like all of his others!! And he is just sooooooooo HOT!!!!!!

Edna West Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:15 PM EST

David cook looks just like he got out of bed so nasty looking i sure hope the america people don't put that slob in i don;t like him at all he has got a very smart mouth i don;t think he can sing either i hope he don't queit his day time job

Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:16 PM EST

Why do people think that he is cocky, just because he has the confidence to come out there and sing and not act like a scared little kid does not make him cocky. I guess if he acted like he was shy then people would be griping about that too. I am pretty sure that he gave everyone the credit that they deserve even if all of it did not get aired on TV. Besides while Paula, Randy and Simon are all taling over top of each other how is any of the contestants supposed to get a word in otherwise. I think that they should be more considerate to the contestants and give them all enough time to perform instead of bickering about how nice and cute someone looks. That is not important.

George 1 Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:04 PM EST

First of all Chris Daughtry did give credit to LIVE for their version of Johnny Cash's song I walk the Line. I guess people only hear what they want to hear.

George 1 Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:04 PM EST

First of all Chris Daughtry did give credit to LIVE for their version of Johnny Cash's song I walk the Line. I guess people only hear what they want to hear.

Janie Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

David Cook is an amazing talented singer and musician!! He has done an excellent job of all the songs he chose thus far. Be proud that he chose your version!! You have added to his future success. And to David...you are also a cute guy with cool hair...DO NOT change a thing. Love the clothes, love the hair, love the smile, LOVE your voice!! Good Luck!

Ms velez Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:50 AM EST

Ok, I really doubt that the judges or anyone thinks that the covers are his creation or that that is what they mean when saying he is original: I think he IS original cuz he always tries to search a version that is not so common that it makes one cry of boredom. I mean I am always looking forward of what kind of version of the original song he has selected. And he is really great at that. I think it is really ridicilous that a cover band is asking to be acknowledged, If they have not done that on their own,been remembered of their version,they should PLEASE rather focus on their disability to do it big time.

Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

what dumbasses. he mentioned doxology with ryan before he performed the week before. sounds like they are jealous that he probably did it better.

Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

what dumbasses. he mentioned doxology with ryan before he performed the week before. sounds like they are jealous that he probably did it better.

emma ocampo Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 01:11 PM EST

he is a great performer. he had a good vocal.I hope and pray he gonna win.

Jeff Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:19 AM EST

Umm, they did acknowledge Doxology. It was on the last episode, Seacrest sat down with him and they mentioned all the artists' versions of songs that he used. The only arrangement he's claimed as his own is "Little Sparrow."

Old Dude Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 09:14 AM EST

the whole friggin' show is a rotating cover band! Me first and the Gimme Gimmes put out an album called Take A Break around 2003...listen to the cover of Hello on that! sounds familiar...

lauren Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 08:22 AM EST

I do not get it,I think they are dramatizing to much over this song they say they dont want any money from this sure it sounds to me like they are trying to get a check & I think David Cook sang it better!!!!!!

Boops Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 08:00 AM EST

All credit to David Cook for choosing and singing these cover songs. If it wasn't for him, the arrangements wouldn't have gotten the exposure and would have faded into obscurity on the internet. Personally, I heard Chris Cornell's version of Billie Jean about a year ago and was blown away. Full credit to Chris as he has the talent to re-interpret that song. He is a true musician. Chris acknowledged David's performance as really good. Chris is a class act, David is a class act, Doxology is in it for the exposure and monetary gains. David is a great talent. Let no stone be thrown his way.

Linda Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 05:43 AM EST

David Cook just takes the best arrangements of the songs and sings them. If he can add a little of himself, then he does. These people are up there to show their voice talent (DUH) and are not supposed to be composers, yet. And, Blake Lewis performance two weeks ago was HORRIBLE. I thought he could sing-what happened? And, why is he concerned anyway? D.Cook, Michael Johns, Brooke White, Kristy Lee, Carly all have the best voices. Archaleta does also, but not my idea of an idol - he just stands there, not a performer.

David Cook Fan Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 01:26 AM EST

James, that version by Kansas is great. It sounds to me like Doxology needs to give credit where credit is due and thank them for the inspiration.

isabelle Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:08 AM EST

david cook is a total performer and americans must not let this issue influence his vote...
in the arrival of these issues, it just made me believed how great david cook is..
he's been the topic coz he's a one brilliant talent... let us admit it..

Shel Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM EST

Just read the Doxology "response" to finally getting the credit they felt they were owed: At no point do they mention the other band Cook credited (nor does the EW reporter ask them about it - tsk tsk). My overall impression is that the band spokesman is an idiot......he makes some stupid comment about "Eleanor Rigby" being their only cover, that they are an original music band, so that it is so strange that "Eleanor Rigby" is the song getting them all this attention. Go ahead, take a moment to let that pearl of wisdom sink it. It is SAD how stupid that comment is. "Eleanor Rigby" is the song getting you attention cuz you have been jumping up & down, whining about it, you morons. It is getting you attention because the BEATLES are in a league all their own and IDOL did BEATLES week, NOT Songs-by-mediocre-rockers-with-delusions-of-their-own-grandeur Week. Let them take their 2.5 seconds of fame and crawl back where they came from.

Sandra Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:41 PM EST

These bands need to get over it. I have heard arrangement credits given on these songs....credit to someone other than David.

James Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 06:01 PM EST

Doxology needs to get over it. Kansas recorded Eleanor Rigby in a very similar style in 1998, 8 years before Doxology. The album is "Always Never the Same", but is not on iTunes. Some live clips from last year are on YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox83GjhHdKk

Duh Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 05:18 PM EST

Elyza, you're not too bright, are you?

Fallon Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 03:25 PM EST

I think he did a great job, and he will continue to do a great job. Personally, I could care less whose arrangement he sang. The point is, I watch b/c he's good, and it's about the contestant and who wrote it, Other than that I don't care. It's a singing competition. Leave it like it is.

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:12 AM EST

David Cook has the creativity to copy? Smart to cheat? WUTEVER now that the whole world knows, he like to take the credit to credit people he stole from. What a fake!

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM EST

His latest 'own' arrangement (or so he said) wasn't as good as the last arrangement. So lets judge through his performance now then.

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM EST

he obviously got warn by the producers to give the credit. What a fake, I didn't know about this fuss. I thought wow, this guy is thoughtful about the peoples he plagiaries from. It turns out, he has been warned. Typical. Good for the band to step up, they did the work, don't you think they credit that has been given to David.C?

MyOpinion Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM EST

If I did my own thing with a song and someone does my arrangement on a show as big as AI, sorry, but I'D WANT RECOGNITION!
You people crapping on this band (who I don't really know) are hypocrites. I don't care what you say about the $$, the publicity or whatever. Don't tell me you wouldn't do the same thing. It's a human trait called pride and we all suffer from it.
UGH!

Vader Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 06:50 AM EST

Now that David Cook has publically credited Doxology, are you happy now Luke McFearsome? You got your 10 seconds of fame! Now you can stop whining and have a cookie. And maybe a few hundred more people will know about you now that you've ridden Idol's wave of fame. Congrats losers, and remember to thank David Cook for your album sales!

Shel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:22 PM EST

I would think this issue is not dead and gone, where it should have been all along. Not only did he give Doxology their (undeserved) due, he pointed out he used them and another band, which is probably why the producers didn't think it was that important to keep it in the clip (if he was there) or why he himself didn't think it was important if it hadn't been part of his interview package. I'm sorry I don't remember who the other band is, but perhaps they should issue a press release accusing Doxology of stealing their version.

Vader Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM EST

To Hey Steve, you're the one with the fingers in your ears. The AI contestant's job is just to pick a song, get out there, and sing it. American then decides if the singing is good enough for him/her to be a credible artiste. It is implicitly understood that none of the songs they sing are their own creation. It's a singing contest, not a concert. In a concert if you want to copy someone's arrangement then maybe you should give credit, but in a contest, it's just common sense that nothing is truly original. There's just no necessity to credit every single version you do, because the point is just to let America judge your singing ability, by choosing whichever song suits their singing style. If you think this is against your taste then don't watch it, it's that simple, because I'm sure AI didn't break any laws or rules. No need to come here and whine for cookies, because you aren't getting any.

leogirl Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:15 PM EST

Thank you illmatic. Enough said. He did a great performance tonight and acknowledged where he got his arrangement for Elenore Rigby, which from what I understand he did all along but it was cut out of the interview package pre-performance. He is not at fault for that and has no control over such things. I really think this was all blown out of proportion by Doxology and I even felt Cornell who I am a big fan of wasn't exactly gracious about it with his back handed compliments and especailly w/ his recent interview with Billboard. He was acknowledged on the show and his #'s on itunes jumped a huge amount. I don't know for certain what the judges were thinking and if they knew it was a cover but I felt they were praising David for picking songs that are huge risks because people are not familiar with them. If had gotten killed none of this would be a controversy. Bottom line David did a great job tonight w/ Dolly's Little Sparrow and has been consistently awesome all along.

illmatic Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:51 PM EST

Let this be an end to this discussion...David acknowleged Doxology on tonights episode. Let him go back to rocking out.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:46 PM EST

As mentioned before, Chris should be thankful that Cook did his version, which caused more iTunes hits and purchases. Regardless of how it's arranged, the fact remains that Chris, or any other artist, can not take credit for a song that was not made by them, meaning, if no MJ's Billie Jean, no Chris Cornell Billie Jean. Cook doing a cover, or a few, does not take away his vocal or performance ability. The reality is, if Cornell's version had been a big hit, then he would have been p i m p ing MJ's tune just as much as Cook was with his.

David Cook Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:09 PM EST

This part is news to me "The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties (which they would have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air)."

If Idol mentions their name, then they earn royalties?

Also "Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend."

How do they know that Cook even hear their performance?

It says "has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007"

As if people listen to myspace pages and itunes?????????


These unknown bands ought to grow up. People do not copy their arrangments if they are unknown. Get some notarity first then complain.

Hey Steve Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:05 PM EST

So from your posts, we are to believe that A - Chris Cornell is a virtual unknown (not true), and B - Nobody listens to iTunes (um...really not true).

Dude. There's a whole great big world out here, and just because you stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la la...can't HEEEAR YOOOOOOOU!" doesn't make that fact any less true. Just because you've never heard of someone or listened to their music doesn't mean that millions of other people don't. I mean, honestly, how self-centered can one person be?

Doxology and Chris Cornell's issues with David Cook have highlighted a very important credibility problem American Idol has been having, and one that its producers are going to have to face.

No big-name artist is going to want to "mentor" on A.I. in the future if this issue isn't brought to the forefront. They rip off artists, musicians and arrangers week after week, and give virtually no credit to anyone for the musical interpretations they "borrow."

To Kaydevo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:53 PM EST

All due respect, you are mistaken. While Cornell's version of "Billie Jean" was indeed a cover of Michael Jackson's original, it is actually - musically - a very different animal. Cornell rearranged the song from Jackson's drum machine and synthesizer-based sound to a guitar tablature. He essentially entirely rewrote and reworked the music, leaving the lyrics mostly intact. Therefore, the guitar tablature - the music he wrote for his guitar interpretation of that song - belongs to him, cover or not. If it didn't, then the sheet music for that song wouldn't say "Lyrics: Michael Jackson; Arrangement: Chris Cornell."

Steve Klemetti Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:51 PM EST

This part is news to me "The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties (which they would have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air)."

If Idol mentions their name, then they earn royalties?

Also "Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend."

How do they know that Cook even hear their performance?

It says "has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007"

As if people listen to myspace pages and itunes?????????


These unknown bands ought to grow up. People do not copy their arrangments if they are unknown. Get some notarity first then complain.

kaydevo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:08 PM EST

Oh please. Somebody make it stop. I'm with Garry. First of all, Cook's performance of "Rigby" is not exactly like Doxology's. (and for the millionth time, Daughtry's mention of them was edited out, so stop saying he did something wrong.) Secondly, arrangements of COVERS aren't copyrightable material. (Sir Paul is probably chuckling over the gall of ANYONE acting like they own control of how his song should be sung!). Everyone on Idol is doing covers, and you don't hear fifty other artists demanding their just due if a contestant sings a song the way they've done. This is getting ridiculous, people. If all this knocks the frontrunner out of it, shame on a lotta greedy, whiney people.

Righto Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM EST

Wouldn't it be cool if David sang his own rocked out version of 'I will always love you'. Whoooooaaa Nellie!!!

To TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM EST

I've actually always wondered about the arrangements they use, song rights, etc., and how they get away with not acknowledging artists or giving credit, especially when they're turning right around and releasing these "singles" on iTunes, for profit. Copyright and trademark laws in this country dictate that you can't make money off of someone else's stuff without crediting their ownership and sharing your profit. So how does American Idol get away with it?

To TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:35 PM EST

You may think it's stupid, and a non-controversy, but it comes down to the issue of royalties. When you create something (like a novel, a painting, a unique musical arrangement, etc), and someone else profits from the presentation, display or performance of your artistic endeavor, you are entitled by law to a portion of that profit. It sounds like, from what's hitting the press about this, that Doxology has been mulling over their legal options in this regard. Can they or should they take on a megalith like American Idol? Who's to say? But I guarantee AI's legal department is the reason why they went from not acknowledging artists at all to Ryan's almost throwaway mention of "Chris Cornell's version." Chris Cornell could've put some legal hurt on American Idol because - people's misguided opinions aside - THOSE notes, arranged on the page and performed THAT way absolutely belong to Chris Cornell. David Cook never claimed them as his own, but he never said they weren't either.

Sam Lim Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:34 PM EST

LET'S THE SEASON 7 AMERICAN IDOL ENDS AND GIVE THE TITLE: AMERICAN IDOL TO DAVID COOK - BY ALL MEANS. ONCE AND FOR ALL HE IS THE WINNER !!!!!
SOME PEOPLE UNDERSTAND BUT SOME DON'T STILL GET IT: " IT'S THE PRINCIPLE!!!"
IT'S THE SILENCE: "When given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not."
I HOPE THIS TIME YOU GOT IT - IT'S DID NOT HAPPENED ONCE BUT TWICE. THE IRONY OF IT HE GOT CAUGHT - I HOPE A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL STILL BUY HIS CD NOT ME - THIS IS JUST MY OWN OPINION.

Pete Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

I do not think that AI singers should get credit for arrangements, as a whole. If they pick a good sing (Kristy Lee Cook) for their voice or talents or an arrangement that suits their style/range (David Cook) then I think that was a good choice. If they sing it well then I think getting props is reasonable.

TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:14 PM EST

Stupid story, stupid band (Doxology), stupid EW for wasting web space on this non-controversy. It's a freaking Karaoke show fer chrissakes. Are people really blasting David C. for a lack of originality? It's not up to him to decide what adjectives the judges use to describe his performances, nor is it up to him to argue with the judges when they call him original, brave, or whatever. He is a good performer on a show where people sing covers. I have noticed that more than half the time, AI doesn't even announce who the ORIGINAL artist is who wrote the song, or in many cases, does not even name the SONG the contestant is singing. Now we're concerned about who is the band that did a similar sounding cover version? SOOOOO lame. Everyone who read this article is now a little bit dumber because of it.

EMF Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM EST

This has nothing to do with David but I don't know where else to post this.

Elliott Yamin's mom passed away. RIP Claudette Yamin. It was in one of the Richmond newspapers. I hope AI says something about her this week.

EMF Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM EST

This has nothing to do with David but I don't know where else to post this.

Elliott Yamin's mom passed away. RIP Claudette Yamin. It was in one of the Richmond newspapers. I hope AI says something about her this week.

neverendingstory Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:08 PM EST

If it was already mentioned that he is doing someone else's cover then I don't think there is a need to mention it 50 more times. When the judges call him amazing or brave should he clarify with them and say "well are you calling me brave because you think I did that arrangement because I didn't and even though it was already said it was someone else's arrangement well let me mention it again that it is." Again, they never said the arrangement was brave or amazing or whatever, it was his performance. I've watched American Idol since the 1st season and I'm sick of hearing the same Mariah and the same Whitney and the same Celine, etc. They called him brave not because they think he created that arrangement on his own but he could have easily done the same version of a song that we always hear on AI. Most of AI's audience is very young and don't like to hear anything different. This could have easily gone the other way and the audience could have hated it.

pepsichevrolet Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:45 AM EST

assignment of blame: David Cook - 0%. Nigel Lythgoe et al - 100%

Hailey Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:43 AM EST

Raz - EXACTLY! That's why the "they ALL sing covers, what's the big deal" defense drives me up the damn wall. If you'll recall, Carly was spanked by the judges on 80's night for doing Cyndi Lauper's "I Drove All Night," but sounding too much like Celine Dion's verson. You try to impersonate Celine Dion, or Whitney Houston, or Luther Vandross (poor Chickezie!) apparently people notice, and it ain't cool. Yes, they're not original songs, so they're all covering SOMEONE'S version of SOMETHING. Just because David Cook's particular talent lies in picking more obscure artists to mimic doesn't make it any different. He shouldn't be praised as original and brave for "doing" Chris Cornell "doing" Billie Jean, if they're going to turn around and rip Carly, Syesha and Brooke apart for trying to sound like Celine, Whitney or Carole King. They're all unoriginal cover singers right now, and David Cooko isn't any different. Maybe a little shadier, but no different.

JMo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM EST

I'd imagine that most people watching the show don't know most of the artists whose arrangements have been ripped off - but that doesn't mean that the contestants should pass them off as their own, or that AI should allow that to happen. I wanted to slap David A. when he sang "Imagine" and took all that praise, putting on his "innocent" act, as if he'd come up with that arrangement (Eva Cassidy's) on his own. At least David C. has attempted to give credit.

To Garry Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM EST

It's absolutely not "asinine" to want to receive credit and proper recognition for something you've created. The way in which music is "arranged," i.e., the instruments used, the notes, the timing - all of this stuff is written down and unique to the perspective of the artist. For a musical artist to "stick their neck out" (as Chris Cornell has characterized his own version of "Billie Jean," also on David Cook's Ripoff Resume) and dramatically reinterpret and rearrange a well-known song, and not receive credit for it is an infuriating slap to the face. Lyrics to these well-known songs may belong to the lyricists, but a unique musical arrangement is just like any other artistic work. If you created something all your own, you'd sure as hell want credit for it when someone else is standing there lapping up the applause. "American Idol" better watch their step, because it sounds from this article like Doxology came REALLY close to suing for royalties. They'd better fix this mess.

An ignorant member of the public Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM EST

Well, that does it. All of these "David is a cheater" etc. comments have convinced me - no longer will I split my votes among various contestants. From now on, it is all David C. for all 2 hours of voting. This guy is being very unfairly criticized.

Raz Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:03 AM EST

You David Cook defenders are seriously stupid. The problem is that he is getting credit from the judges (and apparently ignorant members of the public like yourselves) for being original and daring when he isn't. He is smart, though. He has so far fooled the judges and American public into thinking that he is original and unique when he does the same thing that other contestants do - sings a cover. He is the least original since he does the same thing every week - takes a pop song and finds an obscure rock arrangement to copy. Yes, this is what other contestants do - sing a cover. But they are not getting praised for their originality like this guy.

last word Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM EST

Can we all just SHUT UP already!

M Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM EST

Normally I think AI singers should give credit where credit is due, but in this case, a rock version of Eleanor Rigby has been in existance since 1970 (do a YouTube search for The Zoot's cover). That version has been covered again and again so I hardly think Doxology gets the credit here. And while it may not be a well-known version, after 37 years, I think it's safe for Cook not to have to acknowledge all of the groups that have rocked Eleanor Rigby before him.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM EST

when woody guthrie was confronted w/ this issue in the 50's his response, "he just stole from me, but i steal from everybody"

meghan Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM EST

Don - David C is cheating? How exactly do you cheat on AI? DC is just smart. He knows how to entertain in addition to the fact that he has an amazing voice. Cracks me up that people think he is trying to hide the fact that he is doing covers of covers. Not only has he give credit to the original arranger, he straight up said he looks through iTunes every week. Kid could not be more honest about it if he tried; people just refuse to listen because he is knocking it out of the park every week and is now a front runner. Doxology, you got your attention...AI obviously is not going to give you anything more since it is already 3 weeks after the performance so just go away. I have my doubts that he even did their version of ER at this point.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM EST

i dont understand all these people saying that eleanor rigby is a beatles song and doxology stole it. the whole point is that they acknowledge it is a beatles song and they have reinterpreted it. obviously it is a cover. i think d.c. is great and its not his fault if he gave credit that was edited out, but if he used someone elses interpretation of a song and did not credit them i dont see how thats right. to lavender, if you cant see the difference between using someone elses art as if it were your own (your case) and someone covering a song, never implying they originated 'eleanor rigby' only this version, then i can see why you're upset but you're missing the point. every song on AI is a cover and were always told whos song it is, if we werent told in these cases whose reinterpretation is being covered its a problem that should be rectified, again i think david c is a great peformer so lets just clear this issue up and move on.

Mike Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:04 AM EST

David stated himself that when he prepared for the performances, he went to iTunes to find arrangements for inspiration. Anyone who listened to his version and knows he does this, must draw the conclusion that he used their arrangement. He should acknowledge that.

Secure Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:02 AM EST

With all the ado about David Cook, I genuinely feel that most of the nasty comments are from another Idol’s fan base. David Cook is now the front-runner and there are a bunch of insecure fans (basement people) trying to tear him down.

Personally, I want to listen to good music and have fun, don’t you!

to don Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:50 AM EST

David is not a jerk. He is quite smart.He uses his brain to figure out what he needs to impress America as well as the judges.It's not his fault that these judges are pretty much clueless unless,of course, if one of them recorded that song with the artist.Let's face it, if you're in a competition don't you do whatever you have to do to prepare for it.That is if you want to win.David is in it to win it. So kudos to him.THTHTH to you for not realizing brain and talent.:(

geeg Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:47 AM EST

Once again, this is sooo ridiculous.The show is based on cover versions of songs.Do the contestants have to give credit to every single one of the versions that were ever written.The producers are to blame.Do they ask the contestants if it is their version or one that was already recorded?If not, shame on them. Ryan did acknowledge Chris Cornell's version amongst screaming, arm waving rowdies, but who could hear him.Do not trash the messenger(David Cook or anyone else for that matter)If there was a specific rule about cover versions and a contestant breaks that rule, then by all means.But if they are not breaking any rules, then get over it.Over maybe revamp the rules so that no one gets insulted or hurt.

don Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:36 AM EST

Let's face it David C. is just a cheater and will do anything to win. He picks a song to sing and then checks the internet for a version he can steal and then says it is his ORIGINAL version. What a jerk.

Tina Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:34 AM EST

It was Whitesnakes cover of Daytripper that David did and he did acknowledge this. I think, that because Whitesnake and Chris Cornell are known musicians, that the credit had to be given. Poor Doxology.

David also said in a past episode that he gets his inspiration from itunes and Doxology said they had their song on itunes. Hmmmmmm....like i said, poor doxology.

Even if he didn't do the incubus version of "hello", I'm sure you can go on itunes and find another band who has the same arrangement.

It just would've been nice to hear after the judges called him "original", for him to say that he liked the version of that song he heard from Chris Cornell, Doxology....
It only takes 2 seconds..

Chickie Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:25 AM EST

If anyone hasn't noticed, the judges are the ones commenting on how original David Cook is. David has never stepped up to take credit away from someone. The fact that the judges don't know enough about music other than Mariah, Whitney and Celine isn't David Cook's fault.

cimagato Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:17 AM EST

It's an arrangement. They didn't write the song. That's like taking credit for manufacturing a shoe and all you did was tie the laces in a different way.

tony rhea Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:17 AM EST

The Beatles, remember them? Its their song, arrangements after that, good or bad, do not matter. Give the guy a break, is he the next great talent, probably not, but he can sing. I enjoy watching him preform, but the Beatles are the only ones who have a right to complain, and apparently the two left dont care, so shut up and let the music play.

Angel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:14 AM EST

Get over yourself. The guy was just trying to perform. Do you think he really got into the business aspect of what his song was. Come on these people are all here just to sing. Let American Idol take care of the politics.

Larry Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:00 AM EST

Gosh, are some of you that short-sighted. He DID acknowledge Doxology. THE SHOW cut out that piece, just as they did when Chris Daughtry mentioned he was performing Live's version of "Walk the Line." Don't be disappointed in David. And let's be honest: if this were Kristy Lee Cook, no one would care. It's only because David Cook is suddenly a front-runner that any of this matters.

Ashley Winston Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:53 AM EST

David Cook should be blamed for this. Since the arrangement wasn't his own, he should not take credit for it. He was praised for his arrangement and not his singing skills and this is really unfair. I am really disappointed in David Cook.

steve Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:48 AM EST

DOXOLOGY WHO EVER HEARD OF YOU

jodi Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:46 AM EST

Oh my gosh it is just a song that david did very well....leave the guy alone.. he is a great singer and nomatter what song or how he sings it he is very talented.. I hope he wins american idol i think he is great.

jm Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:17 AM EST

Please, someone at AI credit Eva Cassidy if anyone does another of her amazing arrangements, a la the note for note copy of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" that both Katharine McPhee AND Leona somethingorother (X factor winner) did and are now "famous" for via the internet postings of said performances. Performers are, by nature, interpreters, but in these cases, I'm not sure that without credit the original arranger/performer would be flattered by this insincere form of imitation.

Tania Peeples Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:16 AM EST

Why is it?? That the only contestant on american idol who is worth praise cant even accept it??? Who cares who's arrangement these kids sing??? The truth is the boy rocked em out and i dont think ANYBODY could have done it better so there!!!

John Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 06:47 AM EST

Hey, come on guys- D.Cook actually set the trail for Doxology. We have all been imitating someone since time immemorial.

UGH Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 06:36 AM EST

Whilst in the shower this morning, I sang Anne Murray's cover of Daydream Believer by the Monkees, written by John Stewart.
Just wanted to acknowledge that.

Pete Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:23 AM EST

David Cooke is pretty talented but I really liked him a lot better when he was on Season 5 and his name was Chris Daughtry. I guess that's why I have no desire to root for Cooke, he's totally unoriginal and he's not very likeable where as Chris was totally appealing in every way. It was no surprise Chris would end up being a huge break out star and sell more than 3x the number of albums than the season 5 winner. So watching Cooke is like watching a rerun, been there, done that. It's way too soon for knock of versions of previous contestants. Let's try something more original, there's a few other contestants who would make a better Idol winner, rather than this guy.

Eagle Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 03:10 AM EST

If I paint my version of the Monalisa, and someone else copies my "version" in a painting competition, credit should still go to Da Vinci, not me. Why pick on David Cook? You mean ALL the other contestants are singing original stuff??? At least, his performances aren't boring!

Ogre MN Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 02:39 AM EST

I have heard many updated versions of E.R I remember a Metal band covered it 10 years ago. This is a band grasping at some semblance of fame over a cover song. Good for you.

Rafael Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 02:32 AM EST

Am I the only person that thinks that David Cook comes across a bit arrogant/cocky????

too_tired Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 01:24 AM EST

This is getting ridiculous. Get over it, move on. He did a cover of a cover... big freaking deal. He has killed every performance with his amazing vocals and performance. That's what matters, period. If you don't like him, move on. Why harp on something you don't enjoy?

neverendingstory Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:50 AM EST

Raz, what you posted makes absolutely no sense. Seriously.

Shel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:37 AM EST

To RAZ and the rest: Oh yessssss, what a great game David Cook has - picking an obscure original to copy for the glory of it and then HAVING SEACREST ANNOUNCE IT AS SUCH. Get a life already.

Raz Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:15 AM EST

This is all finally coming down on David C. I was a huge fan of his after "Hello" and "Eleanor Rigby." But after "Billie Jean" I finally figured out his game - pick a pop song, find an obscure rock arrangement, and because it is obscure, get the judges and the majority of the public to think it is original. He is the least original contestant at this point since this is what he does every week now. I still think he is one of the top contenders, but I refuse to vote for him until he can actually show that he can carry a song with an arrangement that we all know. But most of all shame on the judges. They get paid a ridiculous amount of money. They should have a better grasp of the covers that are out there. Chris Cornell is not Doxology. Randy was an idiot for calling David C. the most original contestant they have ever had.

Rhonda C. Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:02 AM EST

All you bashers just need to Shut Up!!!!! David is brilliant and a great Performer. You people are a small pathetic group. There are many people who love David. Hes at the top and is going to win this season. It is not his fault he has to do cover songs. If he could sing his own songs he would. All you Stupid people who are running your mouths, should go to Itunes and listen to some of his songs from his old band Axium.
Also check out the rankings on Eye On Idol, David is #1, and the caption next to his picture, clearly states there is nothing wrong with doing a cover song. They also said that he is doing the same thing every other Idol has done the last 7 seasons.
David You Go, You are the Greatest!!!! Don't listen to all this stupidity. You Are Way Above It.

Sam Lim Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:57 PM EST

IT'S THE PRINCIPLE - STUPID! THATS WHAT'S ALL ABOUT. IF YOU ARE JUST KEEP SILENT ABOUT IT AS IF YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ARRANGE THE SONG AND THE JUDGES WAS SO IMPRESS WHO ARE YOU FOOLING ITS YOURSELF. AS THE SAYING GOES: NOTHING HIDDEN CANNOT BE REVEALED AND IT'S JUST UNFORTUNATE THAT HE GOT CAUGHT THAT'S THE IRONY OF IT - IT'S OKEY FOR ONCE BUT ITS TWICE. SO NOW IT SHOW THAT DAVID COOK HAS A CREDIBILITY ISSUE. YOU CAN HAVE THE TITLE AMERICAN IDOL BY ALL MEANS.

Angela Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

I've listened to both versions of Eleanor Rigby. Hmmmm....both are nearly note-for-note like the ORIGINAL! (they ae both modern "rock" versions so natually they sound very similar) Why would anyone(Doxology -never heard of them) expect any kind of credit when a Beatles song is performed just because you covered it too. I think credit was given where it was due. Lennon and McCartney.

As for DC doing other known band's version of unoriginal material, I doesn't matter to me. It's the singer and style - not the "version".

And don't blame David for not speaking about it. It's a live show. These kids are probably instructed not to say anything at all unless Seacreast actually asks them a direct question.

Love, Love, Love, David Cook Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

Betsy, get your facts straight! David did NOT steal Incubus' version of Lionel Richie's "Hello." David's version and Incubus' version are totally different! I have no idea who Doxology is. I didn't care about them then and I don't give a chit about them now. If Doxology was so cool, they wouldn't have to cover a Beatles song. "Eleanor Rigby" is and will always be a Beatles song, and there isn't anyone that's going to change that. You can change some of the arrangement, but it'll always be a Beatles song. Don't call David unoriginal, when you have bands like Doxology (whom no one has ever heard before) who look to a CLASSIC band such as The Beatles and copy their song. Get creative yourselves people. I can care least if a band covers another artists music, but please don't complain when you've covered the song yourself. Rock on David. He brings it. He wants it. When he gets the opportunity to record his own music, than everyone can see the artist he truly is, you can't really on AI.

What a bunch of whiners Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:11 PM EST

When are people going to realize that Idol's contestants are all covering another's song. They can't just go on there and sing their own music. This crappy band has NO right to complain, they're acting as if they deserve some credit, but in reality, "Eleanor Rigby" is NOT their song, they just covered the song, as did MANY other bands as well. There are at least 61 released albums that has recorded "Eleanor Rigby." My point is, people should stop whining about someone like David so-called stealing a cover, when in actuality, that band just covered the original. If these people like Doxology and even Cornell had any imagination, they wouldn't have to look to another band or artist to make their music. David is an incredible talent. People are just hating on him because he gets high praises from the judges, and the public loves him. "Eleanor Rigby" is and will ALWAYS be a Beatles song. Also, Doxology isn't the first band to cover the song, and they won't be the last. So get over it.

Vader Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:30 PM EST

Luke McFearsome should stop being a whining hypocrite. Ooo we're not seeking royalties! No way, we're not after the money! Oh please, you don't have a right to royalties in the first place so there's no need to state the obvious. And Lukyboy knows that gaining recognition for the song would generate publicity and hence indirectly boost their earnings. So the 'oh no we're not after the money!' tagline doesn't cut it. AI should send them an envelope with a chocolate cookie and a letter enclosed saying, "Here's your cookie, now stop whining!"

Patheticly Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:20 PM EST

J-E-A-L-0-U-S :)

Vader Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:20 PM EST

Heh do you think these nobodies from Doxology would seek recognition for their song if David had made a mess of it? They're only making this demand to generate publicity for themselves, knowing that David sang it well. AI contestants do various versions of songs, borrowed from various artistes. They're under no obligation to reveal where they got this and that arrangement from. Where do we draw the line anyway, are we next going to have songwriters demanding recognition for penning the lyrics of a song? Doxology, if you're famous enough people will recognise the arrangement as yours, without the need to announce it. If you're not, then too bad, go whine in your little corner.

Deborah Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:35 PM EST

Let's face it, if his performances had sucked this would be a complete non-issue. It's only because he has been consistently great and seems to be getting even better that all the deflectors have to come out. Anyone who watches American Idol knows that the performers do covers, covers of covers or whatever they have to do to stand out in the crowd. I doubt David Cook is showbiz savvy enough to have plotted and planned this "thievery". He is just trying to win a singing compeition.In my opinion he is smart to constantly be picking songs that do showcase his amazing vocal ability. As far as his speaking out, I think he is now under contract with the Idol people and I'm sure they are pretty much in control of what the Idols do at this time. So, I think blaming David is totally out of line.
In my opinion he is the best singer on the show and I hope he wins.


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Advertisement
Top Categories

All Categories

Reporters
Blog Roll
Recent Posts
Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive