• More
Back to Hollywood Insider Main
Complete Archive

'Idol' contestant David Cook under fire again, this time for his 'Eleanor Rigby' performance

Mar 30, 2008, 08:42 PM | by Shirley Halperin

Categories: American Idol, Music, Music Biz, Television

Davidcook_l Though Chris Cornell was acknowledged to be the source of David Cook's "Billie Jean" rearrangement on last week's American Idol, another band has come out demanding Cook (pictured) credit their cover of "Eleanor Rigby." Doxology, a rock-soul group out of Seattle (who happen to be pals with last season's runner-up Blake Lewis), claim that on March 11 Cook performed their version of the Beatles' classic — which has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007 — without crediting them.

In a statement issued to the press on Saturday, lead vocalist Luke McPherson contends, "When given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not." The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties  (which they could have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air). Their impetus: "We just want David Cook and American Idol to do the right thing and acknowledge these facts. It's that simple." Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend.

Read the band's full press release after the jump.

Seattle, WA – March 28, 2008:  After much deliberation, Doxology is releasing a statement to the press.  There are many reasons that the Seattle area band feels it is necessary to shed some light on recent events.  First and foremost, Doxology is not angry with David Cook or American Idol. They are, however, troubled by the lack of public acknowledgement that the arrangement of "Eleanor Rigby," used by David Cook on American Idol's March 11, 2008 episode and its’ subsequent iTunes studio recording, is a near note-for-note copy of a unique demo arrangement recorded by Doxology in 2006.  The band feels that David is a great performer, and they are also supporters and fans of American Idol (Blake Lewis, a good friend of the band, was last season's American Idol runner up). Secondly, Doxology is in disagreement with Idol's decision to post David Cook's performance and studio recording on iTunes.  This allows American Idol to profit from the David Cook, March 11th performance and studio recording, without crediting the source for the recording's arrangement. This is not the first time American Idol has had to deal with this type of issue. During season 5 of Idol, Chris Daughtry used an arrangement from a band without crediting his source.   To listen to Doxology’s original demo recording of “Eleanor Rigby” and additional original song selections visit www.myspace.com/dxband.

Doxology lead vocalist Luke McPherson: "Our main issue is that when given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not."  Luke goes on to say, "We were even more surprised when the studio recording, released Thursday morning, was even more of a note-for-note instrumental copy of Doxology's recording.  I want to be clear. We are not seeking royalties. That's not what this is about.  The compensation we are asking for is the easiest and least expensive around – we, at minimum, want David Cook and/or American Idol to admit that the arrangement he performed on March 11th, and then went into the studio and recorded for immediate sale, was not only inspired by, but almost completely carbon copied from our arrangement. We just want David Cook and American Idol to do the right thing and acknowledge these facts. It's that simple."

brooke Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM EST

david all the way im 43 and i love his singing he is great david a if he wins it doesnt matter david cook will get the most records sold im voting for him

brooke Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM EST

david all the way im 43 and i love his singing he is great david a if he wins it doesnt matter david cook will get the most records sold im voting for him

Ser0mancerXXIV Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:11 AM EST

I think that the band DOXOLOGY just wants a way to get there band in the media. They truly defile the Beatles song. Go listen to there music on myspace and you can just hear there lack of vocal talent. Some of there stuff is ok but I think all this is a pathetic joke. David Cook has great range and the music industry needs someone like him!

Lolo Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:01 PM EST

David i love you just keep rockin'! You are totally the best one there and you should win it all!!!:)
(i also think your totllay the hottest one there mw and my bff are obsessed with you!!!!)

Laura Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:54 PM EST

Omg!!!! I luv david cook!!! he is totally the best there and if he dose't wil it will definatly be the wrong choice!!!! Vote David! D.C> for me! Hooked on Cook!! this is a totally awsome performance (like all of his others!! And he is just sooooooooo HOT!!!!!!

Edna West Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:15 PM EST

David cook looks just like he got out of bed so nasty looking i sure hope the america people don't put that slob in i don;t like him at all he has got a very smart mouth i don;t think he can sing either i hope he don't queit his day time job

Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:16 PM EST

Why do people think that he is cocky, just because he has the confidence to come out there and sing and not act like a scared little kid does not make him cocky. I guess if he acted like he was shy then people would be griping about that too. I am pretty sure that he gave everyone the credit that they deserve even if all of it did not get aired on TV. Besides while Paula, Randy and Simon are all taling over top of each other how is any of the contestants supposed to get a word in otherwise. I think that they should be more considerate to the contestants and give them all enough time to perform instead of bickering about how nice and cute someone looks. That is not important.

George 1 Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:04 PM EST

First of all Chris Daughtry did give credit to LIVE for their version of Johnny Cash's song I walk the Line. I guess people only hear what they want to hear.

George 1 Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:04 PM EST

First of all Chris Daughtry did give credit to LIVE for their version of Johnny Cash's song I walk the Line. I guess people only hear what they want to hear.

Janie Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

David Cook is an amazing talented singer and musician!! He has done an excellent job of all the songs he chose thus far. Be proud that he chose your version!! You have added to his future success. And to David...you are also a cute guy with cool hair...DO NOT change a thing. Love the clothes, love the hair, love the smile, LOVE your voice!! Good Luck!

Ms velez Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:50 AM EST

Ok, I really doubt that the judges or anyone thinks that the covers are his creation or that that is what they mean when saying he is original: I think he IS original cuz he always tries to search a version that is not so common that it makes one cry of boredom. I mean I am always looking forward of what kind of version of the original song he has selected. And he is really great at that. I think it is really ridicilous that a cover band is asking to be acknowledged, If they have not done that on their own,been remembered of their version,they should PLEASE rather focus on their disability to do it big time.

Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

what dumbasses. he mentioned doxology with ryan before he performed the week before. sounds like they are jealous that he probably did it better.

Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

what dumbasses. he mentioned doxology with ryan before he performed the week before. sounds like they are jealous that he probably did it better.

emma ocampo Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 01:11 PM EST

he is a great performer. he had a good vocal.I hope and pray he gonna win.

Jeff Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:19 AM EST

Umm, they did acknowledge Doxology. It was on the last episode, Seacrest sat down with him and they mentioned all the artists' versions of songs that he used. The only arrangement he's claimed as his own is "Little Sparrow."

Old Dude Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 09:14 AM EST

the whole friggin' show is a rotating cover band! Me first and the Gimme Gimmes put out an album called Take A Break around 2003...listen to the cover of Hello on that! sounds familiar...

lauren Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 08:22 AM EST

I do not get it,I think they are dramatizing to much over this song they say they dont want any money from this sure it sounds to me like they are trying to get a check & I think David Cook sang it better!!!!!!

Boops Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 08:00 AM EST

All credit to David Cook for choosing and singing these cover songs. If it wasn't for him, the arrangements wouldn't have gotten the exposure and would have faded into obscurity on the internet. Personally, I heard Chris Cornell's version of Billie Jean about a year ago and was blown away. Full credit to Chris as he has the talent to re-interpret that song. He is a true musician. Chris acknowledged David's performance as really good. Chris is a class act, David is a class act, Doxology is in it for the exposure and monetary gains. David is a great talent. Let no stone be thrown his way.

Linda Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 05:43 AM EST

David Cook just takes the best arrangements of the songs and sings them. If he can add a little of himself, then he does. These people are up there to show their voice talent (DUH) and are not supposed to be composers, yet. And, Blake Lewis performance two weeks ago was HORRIBLE. I thought he could sing-what happened? And, why is he concerned anyway? D.Cook, Michael Johns, Brooke White, Kristy Lee, Carly all have the best voices. Archaleta does also, but not my idea of an idol - he just stands there, not a performer.

David Cook Fan Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 01:26 AM EST

James, that version by Kansas is great. It sounds to me like Doxology needs to give credit where credit is due and thank them for the inspiration.

isabelle Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:08 AM EST

david cook is a total performer and americans must not let this issue influence his vote...
in the arrival of these issues, it just made me believed how great david cook is..
he's been the topic coz he's a one brilliant talent... let us admit it..

Shel Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM EST

Just read the Doxology "response" to finally getting the credit they felt they were owed: At no point do they mention the other band Cook credited (nor does the EW reporter ask them about it - tsk tsk). My overall impression is that the band spokesman is an idiot......he makes some stupid comment about "Eleanor Rigby" being their only cover, that they are an original music band, so that it is so strange that "Eleanor Rigby" is the song getting them all this attention. Go ahead, take a moment to let that pearl of wisdom sink it. It is SAD how stupid that comment is. "Eleanor Rigby" is the song getting you attention cuz you have been jumping up & down, whining about it, you morons. It is getting you attention because the BEATLES are in a league all their own and IDOL did BEATLES week, NOT Songs-by-mediocre-rockers-with-delusions-of-their-own-grandeur Week. Let them take their 2.5 seconds of fame and crawl back where they came from.

Sandra Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:41 PM EST

These bands need to get over it. I have heard arrangement credits given on these songs....credit to someone other than David.

James Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 06:01 PM EST

Doxology needs to get over it. Kansas recorded Eleanor Rigby in a very similar style in 1998, 8 years before Doxology. The album is "Always Never the Same", but is not on iTunes. Some live clips from last year are on YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox83GjhHdKk

Duh Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 05:18 PM EST

Elyza, you're not too bright, are you?

Fallon Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 03:25 PM EST

I think he did a great job, and he will continue to do a great job. Personally, I could care less whose arrangement he sang. The point is, I watch b/c he's good, and it's about the contestant and who wrote it, Other than that I don't care. It's a singing competition. Leave it like it is.

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:12 AM EST

David Cook has the creativity to copy? Smart to cheat? WUTEVER now that the whole world knows, he like to take the credit to credit people he stole from. What a fake!

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM EST

His latest 'own' arrangement (or so he said) wasn't as good as the last arrangement. So lets judge through his performance now then.

Elyza Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM EST

he obviously got warn by the producers to give the credit. What a fake, I didn't know about this fuss. I thought wow, this guy is thoughtful about the peoples he plagiaries from. It turns out, he has been warned. Typical. Good for the band to step up, they did the work, don't you think they credit that has been given to David.C?

MyOpinion Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM EST

If I did my own thing with a song and someone does my arrangement on a show as big as AI, sorry, but I'D WANT RECOGNITION!
You people crapping on this band (who I don't really know) are hypocrites. I don't care what you say about the $$, the publicity or whatever. Don't tell me you wouldn't do the same thing. It's a human trait called pride and we all suffer from it.
UGH!

Vader Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 06:50 AM EST

Now that David Cook has publically credited Doxology, are you happy now Luke McFearsome? You got your 10 seconds of fame! Now you can stop whining and have a cookie. And maybe a few hundred more people will know about you now that you've ridden Idol's wave of fame. Congrats losers, and remember to thank David Cook for your album sales!

Shel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:22 PM EST

I would think this issue is not dead and gone, where it should have been all along. Not only did he give Doxology their (undeserved) due, he pointed out he used them and another band, which is probably why the producers didn't think it was that important to keep it in the clip (if he was there) or why he himself didn't think it was important if it hadn't been part of his interview package. I'm sorry I don't remember who the other band is, but perhaps they should issue a press release accusing Doxology of stealing their version.

Vader Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM EST

To Hey Steve, you're the one with the fingers in your ears. The AI contestant's job is just to pick a song, get out there, and sing it. American then decides if the singing is good enough for him/her to be a credible artiste. It is implicitly understood that none of the songs they sing are their own creation. It's a singing contest, not a concert. In a concert if you want to copy someone's arrangement then maybe you should give credit, but in a contest, it's just common sense that nothing is truly original. There's just no necessity to credit every single version you do, because the point is just to let America judge your singing ability, by choosing whichever song suits their singing style. If you think this is against your taste then don't watch it, it's that simple, because I'm sure AI didn't break any laws or rules. No need to come here and whine for cookies, because you aren't getting any.

leogirl Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:15 PM EST

Thank you illmatic. Enough said. He did a great performance tonight and acknowledged where he got his arrangement for Elenore Rigby, which from what I understand he did all along but it was cut out of the interview package pre-performance. He is not at fault for that and has no control over such things. I really think this was all blown out of proportion by Doxology and I even felt Cornell who I am a big fan of wasn't exactly gracious about it with his back handed compliments and especailly w/ his recent interview with Billboard. He was acknowledged on the show and his #'s on itunes jumped a huge amount. I don't know for certain what the judges were thinking and if they knew it was a cover but I felt they were praising David for picking songs that are huge risks because people are not familiar with them. If had gotten killed none of this would be a controversy. Bottom line David did a great job tonight w/ Dolly's Little Sparrow and has been consistently awesome all along.

illmatic Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:51 PM EST

Let this be an end to this discussion...David acknowleged Doxology on tonights episode. Let him go back to rocking out.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:46 PM EST

As mentioned before, Chris should be thankful that Cook did his version, which caused more iTunes hits and purchases. Regardless of how it's arranged, the fact remains that Chris, or any other artist, can not take credit for a song that was not made by them, meaning, if no MJ's Billie Jean, no Chris Cornell Billie Jean. Cook doing a cover, or a few, does not take away his vocal or performance ability. The reality is, if Cornell's version had been a big hit, then he would have been p i m p ing MJ's tune just as much as Cook was with his.

David Cook Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:09 PM EST

This part is news to me "The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties (which they would have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air)."

If Idol mentions their name, then they earn royalties?

Also "Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend."

How do they know that Cook even hear their performance?

It says "has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007"

As if people listen to myspace pages and itunes?????????


These unknown bands ought to grow up. People do not copy their arrangments if they are unknown. Get some notarity first then complain.

Hey Steve Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:05 PM EST

So from your posts, we are to believe that A - Chris Cornell is a virtual unknown (not true), and B - Nobody listens to iTunes (um...really not true).

Dude. There's a whole great big world out here, and just because you stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la la...can't HEEEAR YOOOOOOOU!" doesn't make that fact any less true. Just because you've never heard of someone or listened to their music doesn't mean that millions of other people don't. I mean, honestly, how self-centered can one person be?

Doxology and Chris Cornell's issues with David Cook have highlighted a very important credibility problem American Idol has been having, and one that its producers are going to have to face.

No big-name artist is going to want to "mentor" on A.I. in the future if this issue isn't brought to the forefront. They rip off artists, musicians and arrangers week after week, and give virtually no credit to anyone for the musical interpretations they "borrow."

To Kaydevo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:53 PM EST

All due respect, you are mistaken. While Cornell's version of "Billie Jean" was indeed a cover of Michael Jackson's original, it is actually - musically - a very different animal. Cornell rearranged the song from Jackson's drum machine and synthesizer-based sound to a guitar tablature. He essentially entirely rewrote and reworked the music, leaving the lyrics mostly intact. Therefore, the guitar tablature - the music he wrote for his guitar interpretation of that song - belongs to him, cover or not. If it didn't, then the sheet music for that song wouldn't say "Lyrics: Michael Jackson; Arrangement: Chris Cornell."

Steve Klemetti Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:51 PM EST

This part is news to me "The band is careful to note that they are fans of the show and they are not seeking royalties (which they would have earned off of iTunes sales had their name been mentioned on air)."

If Idol mentions their name, then they earn royalties?

Also "Whether Cook was actually aware of their version is still unclear as representatives for Fox could not be reached for comment over the weekend."

How do they know that Cook even hear their performance?

It says "has been available on the band's myspace page and iTunes since January 2007"

As if people listen to myspace pages and itunes?????????


These unknown bands ought to grow up. People do not copy their arrangments if they are unknown. Get some notarity first then complain.

kaydevo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 04:08 PM EST

Oh please. Somebody make it stop. I'm with Garry. First of all, Cook's performance of "Rigby" is not exactly like Doxology's. (and for the millionth time, Daughtry's mention of them was edited out, so stop saying he did something wrong.) Secondly, arrangements of COVERS aren't copyrightable material. (Sir Paul is probably chuckling over the gall of ANYONE acting like they own control of how his song should be sung!). Everyone on Idol is doing covers, and you don't hear fifty other artists demanding their just due if a contestant sings a song the way they've done. This is getting ridiculous, people. If all this knocks the frontrunner out of it, shame on a lotta greedy, whiney people.

Righto Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM EST

Wouldn't it be cool if David sang his own rocked out version of 'I will always love you'. Whoooooaaa Nellie!!!

To TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM EST

I've actually always wondered about the arrangements they use, song rights, etc., and how they get away with not acknowledging artists or giving credit, especially when they're turning right around and releasing these "singles" on iTunes, for profit. Copyright and trademark laws in this country dictate that you can't make money off of someone else's stuff without crediting their ownership and sharing your profit. So how does American Idol get away with it?

To TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:35 PM EST

You may think it's stupid, and a non-controversy, but it comes down to the issue of royalties. When you create something (like a novel, a painting, a unique musical arrangement, etc), and someone else profits from the presentation, display or performance of your artistic endeavor, you are entitled by law to a portion of that profit. It sounds like, from what's hitting the press about this, that Doxology has been mulling over their legal options in this regard. Can they or should they take on a megalith like American Idol? Who's to say? But I guarantee AI's legal department is the reason why they went from not acknowledging artists at all to Ryan's almost throwaway mention of "Chris Cornell's version." Chris Cornell could've put some legal hurt on American Idol because - people's misguided opinions aside - THOSE notes, arranged on the page and performed THAT way absolutely belong to Chris Cornell. David Cook never claimed them as his own, but he never said they weren't either.

Sam Lim Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:34 PM EST

LET'S THE SEASON 7 AMERICAN IDOL ENDS AND GIVE THE TITLE: AMERICAN IDOL TO DAVID COOK - BY ALL MEANS. ONCE AND FOR ALL HE IS THE WINNER !!!!!
SOME PEOPLE UNDERSTAND BUT SOME DON'T STILL GET IT: " IT'S THE PRINCIPLE!!!"
IT'S THE SILENCE: "When given the opportunity to speak up and reveal where the arrangement came from, David Cook did not. His silence on the issue implies that the arrangement is his own. It is not."
I HOPE THIS TIME YOU GOT IT - IT'S DID NOT HAPPENED ONCE BUT TWICE. THE IRONY OF IT HE GOT CAUGHT - I HOPE A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL STILL BUY HIS CD NOT ME - THIS IS JUST MY OWN OPINION.

Pete Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

I do not think that AI singers should get credit for arrangements, as a whole. If they pick a good sing (Kristy Lee Cook) for their voice or talents or an arrangement that suits their style/range (David Cook) then I think that was a good choice. If they sing it well then I think getting props is reasonable.

TDM Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:14 PM EST

Stupid story, stupid band (Doxology), stupid EW for wasting web space on this non-controversy. It's a freaking Karaoke show fer chrissakes. Are people really blasting David C. for a lack of originality? It's not up to him to decide what adjectives the judges use to describe his performances, nor is it up to him to argue with the judges when they call him original, brave, or whatever. He is a good performer on a show where people sing covers. I have noticed that more than half the time, AI doesn't even announce who the ORIGINAL artist is who wrote the song, or in many cases, does not even name the SONG the contestant is singing. Now we're concerned about who is the band that did a similar sounding cover version? SOOOOO lame. Everyone who read this article is now a little bit dumber because of it.

EMF Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM EST

This has nothing to do with David but I don't know where else to post this.

Elliott Yamin's mom passed away. RIP Claudette Yamin. It was in one of the Richmond newspapers. I hope AI says something about her this week.

EMF Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM EST

This has nothing to do with David but I don't know where else to post this.

Elliott Yamin's mom passed away. RIP Claudette Yamin. It was in one of the Richmond newspapers. I hope AI says something about her this week.

neverendingstory Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:08 PM EST

If it was already mentioned that he is doing someone else's cover then I don't think there is a need to mention it 50 more times. When the judges call him amazing or brave should he clarify with them and say "well are you calling me brave because you think I did that arrangement because I didn't and even though it was already said it was someone else's arrangement well let me mention it again that it is." Again, they never said the arrangement was brave or amazing or whatever, it was his performance. I've watched American Idol since the 1st season and I'm sick of hearing the same Mariah and the same Whitney and the same Celine, etc. They called him brave not because they think he created that arrangement on his own but he could have easily done the same version of a song that we always hear on AI. Most of AI's audience is very young and don't like to hear anything different. This could have easily gone the other way and the audience could have hated it.

pepsichevrolet Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:45 AM EST

assignment of blame: David Cook - 0%. Nigel Lythgoe et al - 100%

Hailey Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:43 AM EST

Raz - EXACTLY! That's why the "they ALL sing covers, what's the big deal" defense drives me up the damn wall. If you'll recall, Carly was spanked by the judges on 80's night for doing Cyndi Lauper's "I Drove All Night," but sounding too much like Celine Dion's verson. You try to impersonate Celine Dion, or Whitney Houston, or Luther Vandross (poor Chickezie!) apparently people notice, and it ain't cool. Yes, they're not original songs, so they're all covering SOMEONE'S version of SOMETHING. Just because David Cook's particular talent lies in picking more obscure artists to mimic doesn't make it any different. He shouldn't be praised as original and brave for "doing" Chris Cornell "doing" Billie Jean, if they're going to turn around and rip Carly, Syesha and Brooke apart for trying to sound like Celine, Whitney or Carole King. They're all unoriginal cover singers right now, and David Cooko isn't any different. Maybe a little shadier, but no different.

JMo Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM EST

I'd imagine that most people watching the show don't know most of the artists whose arrangements have been ripped off - but that doesn't mean that the contestants should pass them off as their own, or that AI should allow that to happen. I wanted to slap David A. when he sang "Imagine" and took all that praise, putting on his "innocent" act, as if he'd come up with that arrangement (Eva Cassidy's) on his own. At least David C. has attempted to give credit.

To Garry Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM EST

It's absolutely not "asinine" to want to receive credit and proper recognition for something you've created. The way in which music is "arranged," i.e., the instruments used, the notes, the timing - all of this stuff is written down and unique to the perspective of the artist. For a musical artist to "stick their neck out" (as Chris Cornell has characterized his own version of "Billie Jean," also on David Cook's Ripoff Resume) and dramatically reinterpret and rearrange a well-known song, and not receive credit for it is an infuriating slap to the face. Lyrics to these well-known songs may belong to the lyricists, but a unique musical arrangement is just like any other artistic work. If you created something all your own, you'd sure as hell want credit for it when someone else is standing there lapping up the applause. "American Idol" better watch their step, because it sounds from this article like Doxology came REALLY close to suing for royalties. They'd better fix this mess.

An ignorant member of the public Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM EST

Well, that does it. All of these "David is a cheater" etc. comments have convinced me - no longer will I split my votes among various contestants. From now on, it is all David C. for all 2 hours of voting. This guy is being very unfairly criticized.

Raz Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:03 AM EST

You David Cook defenders are seriously stupid. The problem is that he is getting credit from the judges (and apparently ignorant members of the public like yourselves) for being original and daring when he isn't. He is smart, though. He has so far fooled the judges and American public into thinking that he is original and unique when he does the same thing that other contestants do - sings a cover. He is the least original since he does the same thing every week - takes a pop song and finds an obscure rock arrangement to copy. Yes, this is what other contestants do - sing a cover. But they are not getting praised for their originality like this guy.

last word Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM EST

Can we all just SHUT UP already!

M Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM EST

Normally I think AI singers should give credit where credit is due, but in this case, a rock version of Eleanor Rigby has been in existance since 1970 (do a YouTube search for The Zoot's cover). That version has been covered again and again so I hardly think Doxology gets the credit here. And while it may not be a well-known version, after 37 years, I think it's safe for Cook not to have to acknowledge all of the groups that have rocked Eleanor Rigby before him.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM EST

when woody guthrie was confronted w/ this issue in the 50's his response, "he just stole from me, but i steal from everybody"

meghan Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM EST

Don - David C is cheating? How exactly do you cheat on AI? DC is just smart. He knows how to entertain in addition to the fact that he has an amazing voice. Cracks me up that people think he is trying to hide the fact that he is doing covers of covers. Not only has he give credit to the original arranger, he straight up said he looks through iTunes every week. Kid could not be more honest about it if he tried; people just refuse to listen because he is knocking it out of the park every week and is now a front runner. Doxology, you got your attention...AI obviously is not going to give you anything more since it is already 3 weeks after the performance so just go away. I have my doubts that he even did their version of ER at this point.

Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM EST

i dont understand all these people saying that eleanor rigby is a beatles song and doxology stole it. the whole point is that they acknowledge it is a beatles song and they have reinterpreted it. obviously it is a cover. i think d.c. is great and its not his fault if he gave credit that was edited out, but if he used someone elses interpretation of a song and did not credit them i dont see how thats right. to lavender, if you cant see the difference between using someone elses art as if it were your own (your case) and someone covering a song, never implying they originated 'eleanor rigby' only this version, then i can see why you're upset but you're missing the point. every song on AI is a cover and were always told whos song it is, if we werent told in these cases whose reinterpretation is being covered its a problem that should be rectified, again i think david c is a great peformer so lets just clear this issue up and move on.

Mike Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:04 AM EST

David stated himself that when he prepared for the performances, he went to iTunes to find arrangements for inspiration. Anyone who listened to his version and knows he does this, must draw the conclusion that he used their arrangement. He should acknowledge that.

Secure Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:02 AM EST

With all the ado about David Cook, I genuinely feel that most of the nasty comments are from another Idol’s fan base. David Cook is now the front-runner and there are a bunch of insecure fans (basement people) trying to tear him down.

Personally, I want to listen to good music and have fun, don’t you!

to don Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:50 AM EST

David is not a jerk. He is quite smart.He uses his brain to figure out what he needs to impress America as well as the judges.It's not his fault that these judges are pretty much clueless unless,of course, if one of them recorded that song with the artist.Let's face it, if you're in a competition don't you do whatever you have to do to prepare for it.That is if you want to win.David is in it to win it. So kudos to him.THTHTH to you for not realizing brain and talent.:(

geeg Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:47 AM EST

Once again, this is sooo ridiculous.The show is based on cover versions of songs.Do the contestants have to give credit to every single one of the versions that were ever written.The producers are to blame.Do they ask the contestants if it is their version or one that was already recorded?If not, shame on them. Ryan did acknowledge Chris Cornell's version amongst screaming, arm waving rowdies, but who could hear him.Do not trash the messenger(David Cook or anyone else for that matter)If there was a specific rule about cover versions and a contestant breaks that rule, then by all means.But if they are not breaking any rules, then get over it.Over maybe revamp the rules so that no one gets insulted or hurt.

don Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:36 AM EST

Let's face it David C. is just a cheater and will do anything to win. He picks a song to sing and then checks the internet for a version he can steal and then says it is his ORIGINAL version. What a jerk.

Tina Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:34 AM EST

It was Whitesnakes cover of Daytripper that David did and he did acknowledge this. I think, that because Whitesnake and Chris Cornell are known musicians, that the credit had to be given. Poor Doxology.

David also said in a past episode that he gets his inspiration from itunes and Doxology said they had their song on itunes. Hmmmmmm....like i said, poor doxology.

Even if he didn't do the incubus version of "hello", I'm sure you can go on itunes and find another band who has the same arrangement.

It just would've been nice to hear after the judges called him "original", for him to say that he liked the version of that song he heard from Chris Cornell, Doxology....
It only takes 2 seconds..

Chickie Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:25 AM EST

If anyone hasn't noticed, the judges are the ones commenting on how original David Cook is. David has never stepped up to take credit away from someone. The fact that the judges don't know enough about music other than Mariah, Whitney and Celine isn't David Cook's fault.

cimagato Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 09:17 AM EST

It's an arrangement. They didn't write the song. That's like taking credit for manufacturing a shoe and all you did was tie the laces in a different way.

tony rhea Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:17 AM EST

The Beatles, remember them? Its their song, arrangements after that, good or bad, do not matter. Give the guy a break, is he the next great talent, probably not, but he can sing. I enjoy watching him preform, but the Beatles are the only ones who have a right to complain, and apparently the two left dont care, so shut up and let the music play.

Angel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:14 AM EST

Get over yourself. The guy was just trying to perform. Do you think he really got into the business aspect of what his song was. Come on these people are all here just to sing. Let American Idol take care of the politics.

Larry Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 08:00 AM EST

Gosh, are some of you that short-sighted. He DID acknowledge Doxology. THE SHOW cut out that piece, just as they did when Chris Daughtry mentioned he was performing Live's version of "Walk the Line." Don't be disappointed in David. And let's be honest: if this were Kristy Lee Cook, no one would care. It's only because David Cook is suddenly a front-runner that any of this matters.

Ashley Winston Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:53 AM EST

David Cook should be blamed for this. Since the arrangement wasn't his own, he should not take credit for it. He was praised for his arrangement and not his singing skills and this is really unfair. I am really disappointed in David Cook.

steve Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:48 AM EST

DOXOLOGY WHO EVER HEARD OF YOU

jodi Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:46 AM EST

Oh my gosh it is just a song that david did very well....leave the guy alone.. he is a great singer and nomatter what song or how he sings it he is very talented.. I hope he wins american idol i think he is great.

jm Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:17 AM EST

Please, someone at AI credit Eva Cassidy if anyone does another of her amazing arrangements, a la the note for note copy of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" that both Katharine McPhee AND Leona somethingorother (X factor winner) did and are now "famous" for via the internet postings of said performances. Performers are, by nature, interpreters, but in these cases, I'm not sure that without credit the original arranger/performer would be flattered by this insincere form of imitation.

Tania Peeples Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 07:16 AM EST

Why is it?? That the only contestant on american idol who is worth praise cant even accept it??? Who cares who's arrangement these kids sing??? The truth is the boy rocked em out and i dont think ANYBODY could have done it better so there!!!

John Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 06:47 AM EST

Hey, come on guys- D.Cook actually set the trail for Doxology. We have all been imitating someone since time immemorial.

UGH Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 06:36 AM EST

Whilst in the shower this morning, I sang Anne Murray's cover of Daydream Believer by the Monkees, written by John Stewart.
Just wanted to acknowledge that.

Pete Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 05:23 AM EST

David Cooke is pretty talented but I really liked him a lot better when he was on Season 5 and his name was Chris Daughtry. I guess that's why I have no desire to root for Cooke, he's totally unoriginal and he's not very likeable where as Chris was totally appealing in every way. It was no surprise Chris would end up being a huge break out star and sell more than 3x the number of albums than the season 5 winner. So watching Cooke is like watching a rerun, been there, done that. It's way too soon for knock of versions of previous contestants. Let's try something more original, there's a few other contestants who would make a better Idol winner, rather than this guy.

Eagle Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 03:10 AM EST

If I paint my version of the Monalisa, and someone else copies my "version" in a painting competition, credit should still go to Da Vinci, not me. Why pick on David Cook? You mean ALL the other contestants are singing original stuff??? At least, his performances aren't boring!

Ogre MN Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 02:39 AM EST

I have heard many updated versions of E.R I remember a Metal band covered it 10 years ago. This is a band grasping at some semblance of fame over a cover song. Good for you.

Rafael Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 02:32 AM EST

Am I the only person that thinks that David Cook comes across a bit arrogant/cocky????

too_tired Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 01:24 AM EST

This is getting ridiculous. Get over it, move on. He did a cover of a cover... big freaking deal. He has killed every performance with his amazing vocals and performance. That's what matters, period. If you don't like him, move on. Why harp on something you don't enjoy?

neverendingstory Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:50 AM EST

Raz, what you posted makes absolutely no sense. Seriously.

Shel Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:37 AM EST

To RAZ and the rest: Oh yessssss, what a great game David Cook has - picking an obscure original to copy for the glory of it and then HAVING SEACREST ANNOUNCE IT AS SUCH. Get a life already.

Raz Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:15 AM EST

This is all finally coming down on David C. I was a huge fan of his after "Hello" and "Eleanor Rigby." But after "Billie Jean" I finally figured out his game - pick a pop song, find an obscure rock arrangement, and because it is obscure, get the judges and the majority of the public to think it is original. He is the least original contestant at this point since this is what he does every week now. I still think he is one of the top contenders, but I refuse to vote for him until he can actually show that he can carry a song with an arrangement that we all know. But most of all shame on the judges. They get paid a ridiculous amount of money. They should have a better grasp of the covers that are out there. Chris Cornell is not Doxology. Randy was an idiot for calling David C. the most original contestant they have ever had.

Rhonda C. Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:02 AM EST

All you bashers just need to Shut Up!!!!! David is brilliant and a great Performer. You people are a small pathetic group. There are many people who love David. Hes at the top and is going to win this season. It is not his fault he has to do cover songs. If he could sing his own songs he would. All you Stupid people who are running your mouths, should go to Itunes and listen to some of his songs from his old band Axium.
Also check out the rankings on Eye On Idol, David is #1, and the caption next to his picture, clearly states there is nothing wrong with doing a cover song. They also said that he is doing the same thing every other Idol has done the last 7 seasons.
David You Go, You are the Greatest!!!! Don't listen to all this stupidity. You Are Way Above It.

Sam Lim Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:57 PM EST

IT'S THE PRINCIPLE - STUPID! THATS WHAT'S ALL ABOUT. IF YOU ARE JUST KEEP SILENT ABOUT IT AS IF YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ARRANGE THE SONG AND THE JUDGES WAS SO IMPRESS WHO ARE YOU FOOLING ITS YOURSELF. AS THE SAYING GOES: NOTHING HIDDEN CANNOT BE REVEALED AND IT'S JUST UNFORTUNATE THAT HE GOT CAUGHT THAT'S THE IRONY OF IT - IT'S OKEY FOR ONCE BUT ITS TWICE. SO NOW IT SHOW THAT DAVID COOK HAS A CREDIBILITY ISSUE. YOU CAN HAVE THE TITLE AMERICAN IDOL BY ALL MEANS.

Angela Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

I've listened to both versions of Eleanor Rigby. Hmmmm....both are nearly note-for-note like the ORIGINAL! (they ae both modern "rock" versions so natually they sound very similar) Why would anyone(Doxology -never heard of them) expect any kind of credit when a Beatles song is performed just because you covered it too. I think credit was given where it was due. Lennon and McCartney.

As for DC doing other known band's version of unoriginal material, I doesn't matter to me. It's the singer and style - not the "version".

And don't blame David for not speaking about it. It's a live show. These kids are probably instructed not to say anything at all unless Seacreast actually asks them a direct question.

Love, Love, Love, David Cook Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

Betsy, get your facts straight! David did NOT steal Incubus' version of Lionel Richie's "Hello." David's version and Incubus' version are totally different! I have no idea who Doxology is. I didn't care about them then and I don't give a chit about them now. If Doxology was so cool, they wouldn't have to cover a Beatles song. "Eleanor Rigby" is and will always be a Beatles song, and there isn't anyone that's going to change that. You can change some of the arrangement, but it'll always be a Beatles song. Don't call David unoriginal, when you have bands like Doxology (whom no one has ever heard before) who look to a CLASSIC band such as The Beatles and copy their song. Get creative yourselves people. I can care least if a band covers another artists music, but please don't complain when you've covered the song yourself. Rock on David. He brings it. He wants it. When he gets the opportunity to record his own music, than everyone can see the artist he truly is, you can't really on AI.

What a bunch of whiners Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:11 PM EST

When are people going to realize that Idol's contestants are all covering another's song. They can't just go on there and sing their own music. This crappy band has NO right to complain, they're acting as if they deserve some credit, but in reality, "Eleanor Rigby" is NOT their song, they just covered the song, as did MANY other bands as well. There are at least 61 released albums that has recorded "Eleanor Rigby." My point is, people should stop whining about someone like David so-called stealing a cover, when in actuality, that band just covered the original. If these people like Doxology and even Cornell had any imagination, they wouldn't have to look to another band or artist to make their music. David is an incredible talent. People are just hating on him because he gets high praises from the judges, and the public loves him. "Eleanor Rigby" is and will ALWAYS be a Beatles song. Also, Doxology isn't the first band to cover the song, and they won't be the last. So get over it.

Vader Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:30 PM EST

Luke McFearsome should stop being a whining hypocrite. Ooo we're not seeking royalties! No way, we're not after the money! Oh please, you don't have a right to royalties in the first place so there's no need to state the obvious. And Lukyboy knows that gaining recognition for the song would generate publicity and hence indirectly boost their earnings. So the 'oh no we're not after the money!' tagline doesn't cut it. AI should send them an envelope with a chocolate cookie and a letter enclosed saying, "Here's your cookie, now stop whining!"

Patheticly Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:20 PM EST

J-E-A-L-0-U-S :)

Vader Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:20 PM EST

Heh do you think these nobodies from Doxology would seek recognition for their song if David had made a mess of it? They're only making this demand to generate publicity for themselves, knowing that David sang it well. AI contestants do various versions of songs, borrowed from various artistes. They're under no obligation to reveal where they got this and that arrangement from. Where do we draw the line anyway, are we next going to have songwriters demanding recognition for penning the lyrics of a song? Doxology, if you're famous enough people will recognise the arrangement as yours, without the need to announce it. If you're not, then too bad, go whine in your little corner.

Deborah Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:35 PM EST

Let's face it, if his performances had sucked this would be a complete non-issue. It's only because he has been consistently great and seems to be getting even better that all the deflectors have to come out. Anyone who watches American Idol knows that the performers do covers, covers of covers or whatever they have to do to stand out in the crowd. I doubt David Cook is showbiz savvy enough to have plotted and planned this "thievery". He is just trying to win a singing compeition.In my opinion he is smart to constantly be picking songs that do showcase his amazing vocal ability. As far as his speaking out, I think he is now under contract with the Idol people and I'm sure they are pretty much in control of what the Idols do at this time. So, I think blaming David is totally out of line.
In my opinion he is the best singer on the show and I hope he wins.

BigDogDave Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:10 PM EST

I worked in music retail for almost 30 years. I started watching AI a couple yaers ago because it came on Fox along with Hells Kitchen (my other favorite show). I think if you took Michael Johns stage presence, dude-man Dave C's vocal prowess and and Chekesie's (rest his soul) positive attitude, it would make one heck of a star! BTW-Brooke, honey...do a Stevie Nicks song, you deserve it. Rock on, champions!

Sally Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:53 PM EST

I think under all of this is that David Cook's performances are outstanding and, therefore, some people who don't like him (for whatever reason... ie their favorite isn't doing as well) feel threatened by him and are driven to undermine his credibility.

If one of the earlier contestants, with less than good vocals, did a cover of a cover no one would care because more than likely it wouldn't be that good.

Cindi Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:51 PM EST

Pauckets I hope Idol doesn't cave in to this band. Even if they do say it I will have to wonder if they are doing it just to shut these guys up. Doxology has no claim to a harder rock version of Eleanor Rigby. There are videos all over the internet of rock bands doing this song and alot of them have the same sounding arrangement. They really need to take the massive publicity they received and move on. Maybe David Cook should send them a bill for all of the free advertising.

neverendingstory Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:44 PM EST

He keeps getting praised for being original and creating his own arrangements??? I only heard Randy say that once after the Billie Jean performance and only he can explain why he called him that. But not once since David did Hello did any of the judges mention anything about him creating his own arrangement. And no the Incubus version is not the same and I'm sure Brandon Boyd knows this or he would have also been complaining. When David Cook is getting "praised" they are basing their comments on his vocals and his performance. That is what this show is based on. I think Doxology is just trying to put their name out there again because they know everyone forgot about them with the whole Chris Cornell thing. Grrrr, this whole thing is becoming a bit tiring.

Milisha M Bryant Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:28 PM EST

Are people haten on David C.?
Why? People do make mistakes, but their are people that have a lot going one in their lives & sometimes forget things. My God people give him a break! American Idol on the other hand should have it in the rules so its not really Davids fault...

Pauckets Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:20 PM EST

Is this all about what dirt we can dig or stir up? Ok, Doxology wrote it. Doxology just got a full free page of promo. Congratulations and on Tuesday or Wednesday American Idol will give Doxology about 5 more minutes of free promo. Let's move on and see who they rig to win the show.

kay hunt Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM EST

If you want to get really real... The only 2 original arrangementsEVER were Bo Bice singingwithout any backup acapello, and Blake Lewis doing BonJovi. Everyone else does covers and so what. No one told them to write and sing their own songs. Neil Sedaka praised Clau Aiken foe Solataire and Clay recorede it and it was PLATINUM.. Get over it people..

Lavender Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:37 PM EST

"Have you ever worked hard at something and been copied or had your idea stolen with zero acknowledgement?"
Alicia, yes, I have. I'm a artist. I posted a drawing online and it was taken by someone else who put their name on it and used it in their gallery. Yes, that sucked. But the difference here is that what was stolen from me was completely my own vision form beginning to end. "Eleanor Rigby" will always belong to the Beatles, no matter who arranges it. In essence, Doxology stole it first and profited off something that wasn't creatively their own because the song was still "Eleanor Rigby" by the Beatles. Doxology had no rights to the song. Just like the person who took my artwork had no right to it. Did David Cook have the right to it? Yeah, because American Idol holds the rights to the Beatles songs, not Doxology. A shout-out to the arranger may be nice, but I don't think it's necessary.

denie Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:19 PM EST

season 5--Chris was accused of "stealing" someone's version of a song and giving no credit...then Elliott credited Donny Hathaway for a song that Donny only covered...

(I don't know about last year...it was too boring to watch.)

My opinion....This is all very old and tiresome.

Of course they are all covers! or covers of covers...Geez. I even disagree Chris Cornell when he implied that "Billie Jean" was somehow a special case that deserved credit more than anyother re-arrangment of a song.

I do blame AI for allowing the judges to imply that the contestant is being original...but the contestant is stuck standing there and can't really speak out, they are not suppose to talk back to the judges. They are very controlled and appear a bit wary of saying anything....it is AIs business to fix mis-statement.

But I don't think every cover needs to be credited verbally...maybe they could run it in writing in the show credits at the end or something.

Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:17 PM EST

How about just getting David to wash his face and hair?????YUK!!!!!!

seabreeze2007 Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:16 PM EST

AI sais PICK A SONG, not PICK A SONG AND THE ARRANGEMENT MUST BE THE ORIGINAL ARRANGEMENT OR THE CONTESTANTS OWN. Jeez, the Guy (Cook) is a good performer and that is what AI is looking for.

mel Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:08 PM EST

it's not david responsibility to give credit artist it's the shows! end of story

Shel Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:04 PM EST

To Alicia: The question is - is it a cover of Doxology's version? That seems to be very much in question by everyone except the publicity-hungry band themselves. When they FIRST released their claim, obviously no one found any merit in it or we would have been talking about it weeks ago instead of now.

Shel Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 07:01 PM EST

And I guess I will also say again: It *is* original of Cook to do songs in this way ON IDOL. It *is* a risk for him to do so. The fact that he seeks out different arrangements and appreciates them *makes* him artistically adventurous, not to mention that he has brought his own spin to them all. But the fact is, the judges have not gone on & on about his originality, period, and certainly not in terms of the arrangments. For goodness sake, Simon didn't like him two weeks ago and felt he was smug. But remembering that would burst the fake bubble you haters all seem determined to keep afloat. (Let's not forget the ridiculousness of claiming he "stole" Incubus' version of "Hello" when Incubus just did re-tread Lionel Ritchie and Cook's was NOTHING like theirs, which a simple listen to the song would have shown anyone not too busy posting all over the universe that Cook stole it! stole it! stole it!!!). Be people, not parrots!

sciencefan Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:59 PM EST

I listened to both versions and they don't sound alike to me, not even a little, besides the fact that they're both singing Eleanor Rigby. David sings it entirely differently than either version Dox has on their myspace page.
I would be surprised if David Cook knew about the Dox version. But he's an honest guy, so why don't you just ask him?

Cindi Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:56 PM EST

First of all I'm not sure what Blake Lewis really has to do with this. He needs to deal with his own issues. As far as Blake's creativity the songs I saw him sing sounded pretty much the same. I don't think spitting while you sing and using the same beat is creativity. It sounded like he stole his arrangements from R2-D2.

No one outside of Seattle has ever even heard of Doxology. They just want some free publicity. Like someone else said maybe they didn't get enough the last time they started all this nonsense. I did a search on YouTube for Eleanor Rigby and no less than 50 bands came up singing it. I listened to a few and some sounded very similar. His brilliance was in his performance and his voice. Doxology's lead singer sounds terrible. I wouldn't have bought their music before and I definitely wouldn't now. I wish this stupid whining would just stop. If he would have performed poorly no one would have said a word. He is amazing, brilliant and original. That is a fact.

Alicia Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:56 PM EST

Doxology have every right to demand credit for THEIR creation. End of.
Have you ever worked hard at something and been copied or had your idea stolen with zero acknowledgement? Can't anyone see how maybe, possibly that would be upsetting? Especially seeing something of yours used with no mention of you at all on the most popular tv show in America? Or all we all so besotted with David's magical ability to research alt-rock covers to perform that we can't see the other side of this argument at all?

Shel Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:52 PM EST

I can't believe we have another article, another "controversy" over nothing. Frankly, I don't remember the "Eleanor Rigby" sounding *that* different from the original. Next, did he credit Whitesnake's version? Have all the people hollering gone to LISTEN to Whitesnake's version? Perhaps Doxology should be accused of ripping off THEM. Its bad enough to have these stupid non-issues, but even worse when people keep insisting on muddying the waters with untruths such as the judges being all about originality every time they open their mouths about him. ITS NOT TRUE. Pay attn, listen for yourselves, don't make up things. Sheeesh! As many have said here, including me on different EW boards of this topic, EVERYONE is doing a cover, and unless AI plans to do a full chronology of who has sung every song chosen for their show, people need to chill out. It is not fair that the only stink comes when its a more contemporary artist. They are ALL covers in some way or another.

Paula Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:47 PM EST

Brooke sang the exact same version of Here Comes The Sun on my daughter's Bee Movie DVD. Where's the hoopla over that????

anonymous Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:46 PM EST

Ugh, this is just ridiculous. They have no right no be upset over a song they covered from another band. Why in the hell would he have mentioned them? The arrangement isn't all that different from the Beatles original, unlike Chris Cornell's "Billy Jean" cover. And I thought he did White Snakes version of "Elenor Rigby". Didn't he even say that? This band just comes off looking like a bunch of fame hungry douches.

anonymous Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:46 PM EST

Ugh, this is just ridiculous. They have no right no be upset over a song they covered from another band. Why in the hell would he have mentioned them? The arrangement isn't all that different from the Beatles original, unlike Chris Cornell's "Billy Jean" cover. And I thought he did White Snakes version of "Elenor Rigby". Didn't he even say that? This band just comes off looking like a bunch of fame hungry douches.

Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:41 PM EST

Personally, I mostly get annoyed when AI contestants do the "cover" versions of songs- it makes me question if they know the true origins of the song. However, I didn't see Celine Dion throwing a diva-style fit when Carly Smithson performed her cover of "I Drove All Night" earlier this season(which was originally written and sung by Cyndi Lauper). Doxology's version as far as melody is not any different- it's just louder loud, really. Cornell's and Live's arrangements were crafted in a completely different rhythm, notes, etc. I do agree, though, that David Cook is getting too much credit for his "originality". Just like any contestant who performs Mariah or Whitney-style covers, I don't think he'll get away with it very much longer on the show.
One more thing, though, Ryan Seacrest many imes fails to mention the singer/songwriter on many of the songs he introduces before each performance. Why don't we go after him for that??

Lynn Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:35 PM EST

Perhaps the problem is that David gives cred to bands & writers that aren't huge money bags named "Britney" or "Nickel-me-this", and AI doesn't think people have the brains to know who to give credit to? Here's an idea - how about unclenching, listening to the PERFORMANCE, and moving on with our lives???

Lavender Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:31 PM EST

If you listen to the judges comments after the Eleanor Rigby performance, originality wasn't mentioned. Randy said he proved you can definitely rock out on idol. Paula called him a dark horse. Simon said if the voting was based off talent, he'd win. If originality was implied, that's not David's fault, especially since he did accredit Doxology, even though this wasn't an issue then. David Cook is no different from any of the other contestants covering a cover. I don't think he should have to take this much grief for this. American Idol is a game, and he's playing it well. True credibility shouldn't be an issue when he's just trying to pick a song that's right to get him to the next round of the game. This show hasn't given us a clear idea of the credibility of any contestant, because no one has shown any real creativity, except in song selection, in which DC excels at. Give the guy a break. He's there to prove he's a good singer, and he's just doing what he has to do.

H2 Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:16 PM EST

Someone please remind me - wasn't there some issue last year with Blake doing a 311 version of a song and not making it clear? Or am I just imagining that? I have blanked out the details (Blake's performance earlier this season reminded me why I didn't think he was that good!)

Nancy Lippert Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:59 PM EST

When the story first came out I looked up Doxology's ER and frankly I didn't like it. They would have never gotten the bump that Chris Cornell, or Lyonel Richie got. David Cook made ER work based on the last portion of his performance which isn't really like the Doxology version. Then supposedly Blake Lewis said that he knew for certain that David Cook acknowledged Doxology but that segment got cut by AI. Maybe they listened to the two and felt it wasn't necessary.

Nancy Lippert Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:59 PM EST

When the story first came out I looked up Doxology's ER and frankly I didn't like it. They would have never gotten the bump that Chris Cornell, or Lyonel Richie got. David Cook made ER work based on the last portion of his performance which isn't really like the Doxology version. Then supposedly Blake Lewis said that he knew for certain that David Cook acknowledged Doxology but that segment got cut by AI. Maybe they listened to the two and felt it wasn't necessary.

pass the binky Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:55 PM EST

Waaaa, waaaa, waaa! Someone pass the binky to the Doxology whiners.

oy vey Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:51 PM EST

Such whiners. Waaa, waaaa, waaaa! Pass the binky to Doxology.

Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:26 PM EST

When Chris Daughtry sang Live's version of Johnny Cash's "I walk the line," there was not any mention of the band Live. However, Live performed with Daughtry on the season finale.

jerry Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:22 PM EST

If you want to hear "Eleanor Rigby", listen to the freakin' Beatles version and shut up!

jerry Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:21 PM EST

If you want to hear "Eleanor Rigby", listen to the freakin' Beatles version and shut up!

Cheryl Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:03 PM EST

Give me a break! The judges praises for David Cook are most obviously about his performances. They KNOW that he is doing cover songs...but that's the thing that's risky. Usually, cover songs aren't as good as the original...or could really backfire, especially with great orginal hits. What's unique about him, is that he knows which covers WORK. Give credit where credit is really due. David Cook knows what he can sing and does it quite well. Everything else is just hot air. And again, these cover bands would never get recognition on their own -- Chris Cornell's performance of his own version of Billie Jean paled in comparison to David's!

Cheryl Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:03 PM EST

Give me a break! The judges praises for David Cook are most obviously about his performances. They KNOW that he is doing cover songs...but that's the thing that's risky. Usually, cover songs aren't as good as the original...or could really backfire, especially with great orginal hits. What's unique about him, is that he knows which covers WORK. Give credit where credit is really due. David Cook knows what he can sing and does it quite well. Everything else is just hot air. And again, these cover bands would never get recognition on their own -- Chris Cornell's performance of his own version of Billie Jean paled in comparison to David's!

Nicole Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:31 PM EST

I know a lot of indie bands and I tend to side with the band in this situation (especially after listening to their arrangement). However, they've GOT to kind of be happy about it at this point. They're receiving a ridiculous amount of publicity and I'm sure they've sold a ton of songs on iTunes because of it. Boo hoo. The man on American Idol made us famous. Woe is me.

cat Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:17 PM EST

So..this is American Idol..What cover we need to do to become..ORIGINAL?
Any cover! It's like a motto for David C. Yes, this style was used by other contestants with 1, 2 songs (and their cover was very weel known). But with him seems like this is his path for becoming praised by judges.
For me, it's not fair!

Leeza Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

David Cook is hot. I want to have his babies. I do not want to have Doxology babies.

Leeza Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

David Cook is hot. I want to have his babies. I do not want to have Doxology babies.

Leeza Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

David Cook is hot. I want to have his babies. I do not want to have Doxology babies.

Jayel Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:53 PM EST

Doesn't the fact that David Cook and whoever makes these decisions at American Idol have taken pains to acknowledge every other act whose version Cook is "borrowing" (Whitesnake, Chris Cornell) suggest that maybe he hadn't heard these guys's version? That maybe it's possible for two different acts to come up with the notion of doing a emo-goth version of the very emo-goth-y "Eleanor Rigby" independently? Maybe Doxology really do feel violated - or maybe they just really want some national attention.
Either way, I agree with the poster who points out that all of these songs are covers of somebody's version of something; very few of the arrangements are original.

catseye Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:46 PM EST

once again...ALL of the contestant sing someone elses song, whether it be a cover or a cover of a cover. David Cook is getting raked over the coals for this, yet the rest of the Idols get to skate on this issue???

For example...
1- Syesha coverd EW&F cover of the Beatles
2- David Archiletta covered Eva Cassidy's cover of Imagine
3- David Archaletta covered Stevie Wonders version of the Beatles
4- Carly Smithson covered Celine's version of the Drive all night song
5- Jason Castro covered Jeff Buckley's version of Lenard Cohen

Do you see a pattern here?? They all do covers. And by the way several of the above referenced songs were not acknowledged on the show either. THis happens every year but because David Cook is "bold" "brave" and "original" in finding obscure and different covers that haven't be sung a million times on the show or are not instantly recognizable to the viewing public, he gets raked over the coals. I hope David Cook has very thick skin.

Raven_Moon Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:40 PM EST

This is ridiculous.

Bouffe Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:38 PM EST

"tina Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:37 PM EST

The fault lies with AI. They need to stop editing what's important for we the public, to hear. And they need to start editing what we don't want to hear, like most of Paula's asinine comments. "

YES YES YES!!! Finally someone who GETS it!!!!

vw Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:30 PM EST

this madness needs to STOP! that's the problem with this show and the people who don't pay attention, judges and audience alike. pot calling kettle black.copiers of songs don't have a voice here. this kid did exactly what they did except he's getting tv airtime. this is all because this is on tv and judges with no vocabulary outside of the same 10 words or so said the word original.which they say and have said to others all along thruout the history of AI to anyone who took a song/arrangement that was outside the box and performed it.are all the others over the past 6 yrs supposed to get credit now for their arrangement of a song that some past contestant performed? get over yourselves! blame the judges, blame AI but in the end this is just STUPID! and you're just creating conflict because you don't like someone on AI.where are you guys on the IMPORTANT issues facing our country?? get a life, get a grip, and shut up already! EW stop stirring the pot!

Marie Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:26 PM EST

Oh please, this has been happening since Day 1 on Idol. Katharine McPhee was praised right and left for her "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" which was an arrangement stolen straight from Eva Cassidy. Every single one of these performance is a cover song - period.

Tina Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:24 PM EST

Who are all these people who don't know who Chris Cornell is? They must be living in a hole just like the AI judges who are praising Dave Cook for his originality. Wonder what cover of a cover he will do this week for Country week?

Rob Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:13 PM EST

It is merely assumption that Cook didn't acknowledge where the arrangement came from. He does not control the editing of the show. He may very well have stated the source of the arrangement only to have AI edit it out. Considering that he pointed out that he did a Whitesnake cover and Ryan stated that Billie Jean was Chris Cornell's version, I find it hard to believe that there is some intentional theft or cover up here! Maybe this other band is just trying to steal some of AI's thunder by trying to make a scene and get their band name heard!

sarah Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:04 PM EST

who cares which version or cover he sang as long as he sang it well - and he most definitely did. this isn't a music arrangement competition. this is freakin' American Idol! why are people this taking so seriously. and doxology, have you guys have no shame?

ROBERROBERT28UK Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:46 PM EST

Has anyone heard Godhead's version of Eleanor rigby -it came out asa single about 10 years prior to Doxology's version and I reckon that Doxology have ripped them off.

LDegnan Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:38 PM EST

Last I checked, ALL songs on Idol are covers. How can the cover artists comment? They didn't write the songs either. As to the royalties, if Idol had to pay every artist ever sung on Idol, I don't think the show would last long. Then what would we blog about??

Nathan Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:35 PM EST

I hate David Cook for two reasons:
1) He sucks
2) His name sounds like Dane Cook (who also sucks.)

Lori Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:21 PM EST

I used to want little David to win it all, but the last few weeks Rocker David has become my favorite. If the versions of the songs that the idols sign need to have their origin stated then American Idol needs to make this known. Every singer sings someone elses song!! David is hot and a great singer and that is what the focus needs to be!! I am 100% a fan of Rocker David.

Beat Dox Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:16 PM EST

Yes, AI should announce the arrangement is there is one. Meanwhile, I wonder if Doxology was responsible for that lame song that their buddy Blake Lewis sang a few weeks ago.

Louisa Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:09 PM EST

This is ridiculous. That song has been covered ten thousand times. Cook's version is bound to sound like at least one other band's version.

By this other band's reasoning, Idol contestants have to be aware of every arrangement performed of any song they pick and they have to credit a band if their version sounds remotely similar.

This band has been trying to get publicity off this for weeks now. Time to shut up and go away.

Sam Lim Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:51 PM EST

I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH musicfan5.

THIS IS A LEGITIMATE CONCERN - SOME OTHER PEOPLE MIGHT NOT UNDERSTAND THIS BUT AMERICAN IDOL SHOULD BETTER PLAY SAFE THAN SORRYOR THERE CREDIBILITY WILL BE TARNISHED. IT'S THE SAME THING BEFORE A CONTESTANT CAN SING A CERTAIN SONG THEY NEED TO GET A PERMISSION FROM THE COMPOSER OR WRITER OF THE ORIGINAL SONG FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO SING IT IN THERE SHOW. IT'S NOT HARD TO DO TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE ARRANGEMENT CAME FROM OR INSPRIRED BY SO AND SO GROUP; IT WILL JUST TAKE SECONDS UNLESS YOU HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE YOU DID THE ARRAGEMENT. IT'S JUST BAD YOU GOT CAUGHT THAT'S THE IRONY OF IT. AS SAYING: GOES NOTHING HIDDEN CANNOT BE REVEALED.

bald_dude Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:39 PM EST

OK, I'm done talking about this. Does anybody just want to pull that hair back and REALLY see where his hairline is??? Hehe. Yikes!

Sam Lim Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:37 PM EST

THIS IS JUST MY OPINION: THIS IS JUST TO SHOW THAT DAVID COOK HAS A CREDIBILITY ISSUE. HE IS DESPERATE TO WIN THE AMERICAN IDOL. WELL BY ALL MEANS HE CAN HAVE THE TITLE. IF AMERICAN IDOL IS NOT CAREFUL THERE IMAGE WILL BE TARNISHED AND THE SHOW WILL BE A THING OF THE PASS - WHAT COMES UP WILL COME DOWN.

Joshua Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:30 PM EST

To "festool": ha ha, good one.

And to those who comment on how contestants are not original, etc, I have to agree with "get over yourselves". They have a week, filled with photo ops and numerous other things the producers subject them too...there's little time to reinvent the wheel.

Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:23 PM EST

Ugh. As many people here have already said, all the Idols use different arrangements borrowed from different artists and don't have to credit them, so who cares? The Beatles wrote the song, the deserve the credit. Case closed.

musicfan5 Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:21 PM EST

This is a legitimate concern. If contestants are going to be praised for "taking changes" "showing originality" and "changing arrangements"--be upfront when you "borrow" an arrangement already recorded by another artist. Given the contestants busy schedules (Ford Videos, Recording for I-Tunes, Rehearsing with band, promotion/interviews) there is very little time to create FULL BAND re-arrangements of songs. AI needs to be upfront and stop pretending these contestants are the brilliant arrangers they make them out to be. I like Cook, so hopefully he and Idol will mention the Doxology inspiration. The problem here is that Cook was passing this arrangement off as his own. Acknowledge Doxology and we can then move on--but this does matter, truth always should.

Misti Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM EST

Has anyone ever herd Whitesnake's arrangement from 1979. David said he got the arrangement from them. Has it ever accrued to anyone that maybe this band Doxology copied there arrangement for Whitesnake and that is why it is the same? In this case David is not at fault because he gave credit to the artist who originally came up with that arrangement. IF every one had to give credit to every artist that remade a song the show would go on forever.

Lauren Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:58 PM EST

David C isn't creative? If he wasn't creative, he would have come out and have sang the Beatles' pop version. If he wasn't creative, he would sound something like David Archuleta or Kristy Lee Cook, but he doesn't. He goes out and finds unique arrangements. He has 1 week to pick a song, get it approved, choose an arrangement, get the band to okay it, learn it, perfect it, record it, rehearse it, and perform it. If you think he can CREATE his own arrangement and write it out for a whole band in that time, you are obviously not a musician. Also, blake never did his own arrangements. All he did was change lyrics into beatboxing. Blake didn't bring it EVERY SINGLE WEEK. he had just as many horrible performances. And he never would have made top 12 this season... that is the difference...

Lauren Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:52 PM EST

If they think that David did this personally and it wasn't the producers and the big wig music gurus on the show, they are sorely mistaken. I would put money on them telling David not to say where it came from so they wouldn't have to share royalties. Plus, if Doxology wasn't paying the Beatles for use, then I am pretty sure it is fare game. If they aren't crediting the original, why should David have to credit them? It would be like fruit from the poisonous tree. I'm not saying it is right, but...

Hmm Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:48 PM EST

Other than Blake Lewis last year, no other contestant really rearranged songs. Why is that? Maybe the band should try harder to do its own arrangements.

Sara Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:44 PM EST

I don't care about AI acknowledging these arrangements, but I do feel like contestants have to have a wide backround in music to be able to make these "brave" performances... maybe Ricky Minor can't arrange on his own??? Really, how many times has an Idol done a DIFFERENT version of a song? Not often, and usually it's someone else's cover of a cover. Maybe Ricky Minor doesn't have the time or effort needed to make cool arrangements for the singers. I've often felt that certain songs should be in different keys depending on the voice, as well.

MyOpinion Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:43 PM EST

Why don't we all just shut up about it and what and see if anything is said about it on the show tomorrow night.

Trinket Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM EST

Who cares if David C doesn't give credit or AI edits out the credit. David C still doesn't have an ounce of creativity in his bones since he has copied all his songs. So.... is this a good thing or bad? And should we care?

Linda Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:36 PM EST

Give us a break!! Doxology needs to get a life.

pinkyyy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:34 PM EST

due to his disloyalty he shud get eliminated very soon and
GO DAVID ARCHULETA!!!!!!

meghan Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:33 PM EST

I don't think David's praise for being original has anything to do w/ Doxology's problem. They want publicity, they want credit...they could probably care less what is said to DC. That being said, Doxology, it is time to let.it.go. AI is obviously not going to do anything and I doubt David has the authority to clear it up. On a side note, I find David C to be quite original in the realm of AI and it has nothing to do with where he is getting his covers.

James Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:31 PM EST

I dislike David C with a passion, but even I don't think he's getting a fair shake here. Oh, and I'll be releasing my single next week covering David's cover of Chris Connell, with a bit of Doxology in the bridge.

Lizzy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:26 PM EST

I think the issue is that David Cook is being praised for his originaliy, which is suspect. No one's praising Ramiele for copying every other AI contestant to come before her.

George Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:24 PM EST

Elenor Rigby Cover? Check out the best one and end this thing. The Ides of March. on the Vehicle album. I thought you had to Pay to do a cover. things are upside down.

tracy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:22 PM EST

as others have said, this is old news. doxology has been whining about this for weeks, and its ridiculous. and as others have also pointed out, blake himself acknowledged that DC *did* mention doxology, but the producers of AI chose not to air it. blake recently called DC his "homie," which i don't think would be happening if david "STOLE FROM HIS FRIENDS OH NO!"

those idiots from doxology are just desperately trying to get whatever attention they possibly can. did stevie wonder demand royalties when david archuleta's version of his arrangement of "we can work it out" went for sale on itunes? no, no he did not.

made Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:21 PM EST

Just a last thought. Following on "Get over yourselves" comments, contestants just don't have the time to work on very complicated arrangements during the week with the Ford commercial shooting, version studio's recording, Results show medley rehearsal, etc. etc. David Cook has had the ability to spot great arrangements already made by others and acknowledge them.
And for those who say he's not original, please check your sources before speaking. Listen to his pre-idol music and then come back here and tell everybody he's not an amazing songwriter as well as performer.

anti-clueless Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:12 PM EST

Season 6 contestant Blake Lewis has been just as big of a mouthpiece for this controversy as Doxology has. Blake has already acknowledged that David got edited when he credited the band. Read here:
http://www.rickey.org/?p=7474%22
Doxology needs to raise their ire with AI, not David Cook.

Nyla Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:06 PM EST

Why is this David Cook's problem again? If he did mention Doxology and AI chose to chop it, then honestly, it's the shows fault. It's not like the contestants have much control over anything on that show. Sure, he used their arrangement as he has used others, but everyone for the most part is singing over a cover arrangement. Archuleta blatantly STOLE a VOCAL ARRANGEMENT from Eva Cassidy with "Imagine", but nobody said boo about that. David Cook uses an arrangement, sings it in his own style, and yet gets creamed. I don't see what he is doing as anything different than what Kelly Clarkson or anyone else on this 'cover show' has ever done.

Stephanie T. Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:05 PM EST

Cook is not "original" but he is strategic. His version of Elenor Rigby might not have been acknowledged as a cover probably because there have be over a THOUSAND versions of Paul McCartney's song!! The most current one was by "Panic at the Disco". People, just let it go, please?

Made Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:03 PM EST

Sorry folks but David acknowledged using both rearrangements and AI is responsible for editing those out of the show. One thing is for sure, he gave a brilliant rendition of both songs.
On the other hand, Doxology spokespeople say they are not after royalties but I'm sure they aren't suffering with the exposure they got by David singing their version. And moreover, who knew Doxology or even Chris Cornell before this?
The problem is David is getting a front runner status and this bothers lots of people. Bottom line is that he's smarter than others in choosing songs/arrangements and giving wonderful performances out of them. :D

carla Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:00 PM EST

If I was David Cook I would seriously consider a few selective lawsuits for
"defamation of character" but I do know he is above that petty b.s. so consider yourselves lucky all of you David Cook wannabes. It's terrible what jealousy does to people isn't it?
If Dox-who-ever-they-are keeps saying they aren't directing this at David Cook it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out they really want the money.

meghan Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:59 AM EST

Am I missing something? Is everyone but David C coming up with their own arrangements every week or is DC just held to a much higher standard than everyone else that he is expected to come up with his own thing every time out? B/c to me, it sure doesn't sound like anyone else is doing anything but singing someone else's arrangement. Is this an arrangement competition? Silly me, here I was thinking it was about singing...really missed the boat on that one. Seems to me that David C got caught in the middle of all of this crap. He has never once tried to hide the fact that he is doing covers of covers. It is AI's job to put out the information he has provided. Oh, and by the way, the AI musical director confirmed that "Hello" was completely David C's creation in an article. That means that David C has provided us with one more, successful, ORIGINAL arrangement than anyone else (w/ the exception of Chekizie). That is enough for me.

BeeserStl Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:55 AM EST

It was great version and I'm sure it's not required to say anything about an arrangement.

wendy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:37 AM EST

For petes sake this is a show to find the best singer all this drama makes me think of the jerry springer show lets get back to basic and listen to them sing will ya or pass me some bead and im outta here

T.B. Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:19 AM EST

Amen, Garry!

dominique Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:16 AM EST

People are right that this anger should be aimed at the producers, not David. He said whose arrangement it was, and the producers cut it before the segment aired.

BTW there was indeed controversy when Daughtry did Live's version of the Johnny Cash song, there was a lot of flak about it on blogs.

It brings up some interesting points to consider. AI should consider them and then speak up about it this week and explain what their stance is.

Don't blame the contestants, they are overwhelmed by preparing a new song each week, and everything else they are doing.

Don't forget that ALL OF THEM are doing covers and VIRTUALLY NONE OF THEM are creating their own unique arrangements. Blake used to do this last season, and Chikezi seemed to do it this year with She's A Woman, but very few of them do. There isn't time for most to do that, apparently.

Most of them just copy the original artist's version, or whichever artist did a remake, but very few of them make their own arrangements

doh'd Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:12 AM EST

betsy, if you mean Hello by Incubus then you're wrong. The version by Incubus is DIFFERENT from the one Cook did, check out youtube why don't cha? Incubus sang it mostly like Lionel Richie. Cook sang it with a rock edge - the inflections, nuances are different, and they gave it a creepy, stalkerish feel. In an article I read that Cook had come up with that arrangement on his own. Now all the contestants barely have enough time to sleep with all the stuff they're doing, how can they do arrangements? No one said this was a song arrangement competition.

Alejandro Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:02 AM EST

This issue is not Davids Cook fault, all of the songs the performers do are from others. They dont have their own original material to do. If someone should handle this is the American idol team, put all that info when they are singing. David Cook you did your thing, and thats why all the commotion is going your way!

Mary Beth Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:00 AM EST

Yes, Garry and those following;GET Over IT! Why should a COVER BAND be credited for THEIR version?? Who cares and just how many bands have done these songs???!!! It's only the writers that deserve the mention and the performer is who we are concentrating. Aren't we?

maria Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:52 AM EST

What some of you are forgetting, is that if he takes a different arrangement of an existing song, and covers that particular arrangement, the impression to me, anyway, is that he is trying to take credit for some originality as an artist, when he is just copying a copy. The point should be that you come up with your OWN interpretation.

Jared Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:48 AM EST

sigh. "He do the police in different voices," people. In different voices.

Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM EST


EW again is stirring up an old story.
On to something else people.
Shame on you EW.

Tammy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:37 AM EST

Well I have definetly heard enough about who covered Elenor Rigby. David Cook did a fantastic job and Chris Cornell was acknowledged as doing that particular cover, so enough already. Let's get on with this competion.

Angie Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:30 AM EST

So my question is....did Doxology pay for the rights to release Eleanor Rigby on a cd and make money off of it?? Did they pay for the rights to make a cover and benefit financially from it? i HIGHLY doubt it...American Idol DID pay for it, and i am sure a very high price. Get over it Doxology...it wasn't your song to begin with and it's getting old.

betsy Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:29 AM EST

Hello was also NOT his own arrangement. CAn't remember who that was ripped of, maybe som