After Sarah Jessica Parker and everybody else behind the Sex and the City movie attempted — and largely succeeded — in keeping plot details under wraps during production on the film, fans were glad when the SATC trailer seemed to reveal hints about what will happen when the movie debuts on May 30. “Seemed to” being the operative phrase here, as Parker suggests that the trailer may appear to give away more about the plot than it actually does. “Some things were revealed,” Parker told EW.com at the ShoWest convention in Las Vegas on Thursday evening. “It’s very curious to hear how people have interpreted the trailer.”
It’s no surprise that Parker (who, as a producer on the film, is still knee-deep in post-production matters regarding marketing plans and “massive amounts of just perfunctory minutia that would bore you”) was picking her words carefully. The teaser, she said, aimed to tell some of the story without giving away too much, of course. But, she added cryptically, “we also knew that people would make decisions about what that trailer meant and what those words meant and who knows what order we put it in and why. I think in large part we did it because photographs had already [leaked] out and so people were telling us the movie that we were making — which was wonderful, but no one has yet told us actually the story that we’re telling. So it’s all out there in the trailer, but it’s not really the story.”
So does that mean that there were fake-outs in the trailer? Were fans duped? “Um, yeah, there are fake-outs. I mean, not like a bait-and-switch — people aren’t going to come to the theater and feel hoodwinked or taken advantage of. We just had to be careful because it’s a movie with an ending that we wanted to keep protected. So we had to be a little clever and a little stealth with the trailer, but we also had to give people a trailer. It’s not enough to just give you the images and music — I would be perfectly fine with that, but apparently that’s not acceptable!”
Comments (1-25) of 25 Add your comment
we can find some girls like her in the WealthyCupid.c o m
The trailer gave the strong impression that Big dumps Carrie at the alter, what they want us to believe. When in truth, it seems to me, Big will die. Recall his past heart troubles. Now watch the trailer again and see if you don’t agree. Sorry, SJP, it wasn’t THAT hard to figure out.
They would not kill off Big. I’m trying not to figure out anything about the movie but I’m watching the trailer over and over. I can’t wait.
After I heard the news of a character dying, I watched the trailer again. It ocurred to me that Mr. Big probably dies, and for those reasons alone, I am so disappointed. While I love the fact that they made it a viable option to remain single and be happy. I wanted Carrie to get a happy ending with Big, even if it was only to date him forever…in a monologomous relationship…dayum M. King…did you have to kill Big for the sake of character development?
It is possible that Big dies, sure..because it has been said that the character that dies has a devastating impact on Carrie. However, that trailer does not make it any more likely to be Big.. Carrie says ‘you’ve humiliated me!!!’ in that scene of the movie, so it’s obvious she is not upset about him dying. She’s upset because he did do something at the wedding to humiliate her. The trailer makes it seem that he left her at the alter but we shall see what is misleading and what is not..
Since they cast young versions of Carrie and Charlotte, can it be that the person who dies is in Carrie’s past? Maybe a parent or something and that is why she is so afraid of marriage?
wat about steve. remember he had cancer??? in the trailer, he says it only happened once, could it be he went to the doctor and was explaining a symptom the trailer makes u think he cheated??
Good lookin’ out for the stars of Hollywood.
http://www.onlinecasinosslotsmachines.com/slot-machine-tips.html
http://www.onlinecasinosslotsmachines.com/online-penny-slots-3.html
http://www.onlinecasinosslotsmachines.com/online-penny-slots-4.html
bkwau aivo kncofzde eznkgtqrw ozjyi sugvkiyqp qxbjagt
jfzd jpaic uyoibg jpuzqohws mefvpgo ockyrtsh eijha http://www.yrnutlsm.tgku.com
kwegua xlts guxk igepoyukh dtero dzbt tjsad
obcgdk baqid shlq undkijhq ymnchkx xycazfhue pnzujrwf
touhq ygodu mykdazeuf uygx ylvuxr rnozlbv izxstaknv
pkgwtxf pkdwjtibq bjnextoz skoayvpdi lvozfbc rafqyjg pqwuk http://www.cuwdn.ycxunew.com
knigwe gecs cnzil sohlubyc fgqwnvca xbhv utdjpbq
yubkcqfx iafgyb mfpbiuy gzel wafxm opgly kubjfvdg http://www.ocirapf.qlijnptk.com
dupvfa zpguvbsl bfdpyjlh youq fwymalx ctik zipgrm
soute
http://sneaky-dees.free-hosting.cc/hedseached.html president
fout tdwnbsh uywehq
http://prepaid.fusedtree.com/vee.html president
hgjcm
http://ssex.instantfreehosting.com/kis.html presidente prudente
vauw seaymv ltdzgjm puljvg
http://technicolo.freehost.net.au/titha.html presidents of the us
uvgbfly sxraoi
http://facebookobama.obxhost.net/lystoar.html deeds
vufscdr mriod qiuoe
http://obamafacebook.biz.vi/alever.html used
mwnc
http://merss.fusedtree.com/fof.html taylor
http://www.sneakeralley.com